Thanks Peter. > From the Arm PoV that statement is still mostly correct, but it's > nuanced as there's group that is focusing on some of those devices. I > think there will be a focus in that group on actively open phones, I > still wouldn't expect your average locked down consumer phone to be a > focus.
Do you mean tha Librem 5 is not "open" enough? > So there is now a new group [1] that is actively looking at phones and > tablets, in particular the PinePhone and the PineTab. This is the > right mailing list to discuss and there's also an IRC channel > #fedora-phone too. I missed this piece, I focused on aarch64. Is this SIG communicating with the Purism team? > All the pieces for that device are enabled in the Fedora kernel, we > don't build a boot firmware for any i.MX8 stuff ATM because basically > "it's complicated". I'm aware of a number of i.MX8 devices that do > work once there's an appropriate firmware in place. Good news, I suppose... > There's active work around the Phosh phone graphical environment. Nice, is there something about Plasma Mobile? > So in short most of the pieces are in place, I'm not aware of anyone > that's actually tested one of those devices as yet but there was > certainly interest. I've some experience in building Fedora images (I'm the maintainer of [1]) on x86, but arm is a different game. I'm still investigating, but I'd like to boot a Fedora on this device (like I do in my PCs). Phone is not a priority for me, but convergence is a good point. [1] https://github.com/mbugni/fedora-remix _______________________________________________ arm mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
