Once upon a time, Dennis Gilmore <den...@ausil.us> said:
> Last I knew, we did not have hardware available to sign the
> secure-boot binaries at build time for AArch64. so we have not gone
> through the process to have Microsoft sign shim.  The way that it
> works on x86_64 is that there are dedicated builders with smartcards
> installed that have the keys for signing. pesign Is used to do the
> signing. In order to sign the binaries on AArch64 we would need some
> builders set up the same way, and then we could sign grub, shim, and
> kernel. Then we would have shim signed by Microsoft and included in
> the shim-signed package. Today, the only way to enable secure boot is
> to sign the binaries yourself and enroll and trust the keys in the
> system.

What AArch64 hardware ships with SecureBoot and MS's keys in firmware?
Does that include a "third-party" key like on x86_64 (which wasn't
enabled by default for example in my newest Thinkpad)?  IIRC MS was
treating SecureBoot on AArch64 different at one point, like I thought
they were only including a key for their own use.

-- 
Chris Adams <li...@cmadams.net>
-- 
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to arm-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to