Randy,

On Tue, 16 Sept 2025 at 01:17, Randy DuCharme via arm <
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> Once upon a time Fedora used to work.  Fucking dick weeds just had to go
and destroy it   fucking asshats

I am sorry but abusive language like that on this list will not be
tolerated.

Nobody, especially me as the Raspberry Pi maintainer in Fedora, do not go
around destroying anything. Hardware support, especially the raspberry pi
in particular, are hard to support and there is a lot of environmental
issues that come into play such as PSU, uSD and numerous other things that
make it even harder.

> Randall DuCharme (Radio AD5GB)
> Powered by Open Source software.
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2025, 19:08 Chris Adams via arm <
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>>
>> Once upon a time, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> said:
>> > > Why choose U-Boot for booting on a Pi 4 (or other ARM, but Pi 4 is
what
>> > > I've got)?  I still have issues with U-Boot not having a way to
disable
>> > > serial console (so booting headless with my GPS HAT can be hit or
miss,
>> > > sometimes I have to power-cycle to get it to boot).  IIRC EDK2 allows
>> > > disabling the serial console so this isn't a problem.
>> > >
>> > > Would it be practical to get EDK2 into Fedora as an alternate boot
>> > > option?
>> >
>> > There's a lot of other problems with the EDK2 support, it's fine for
>> > some usecases and not for others.
>> >
>> > Given that we have to support U-Boot on all the 100s of other devices
>> > we support U-Boot has always made sense because EDK2 support is a lot
>> > more varied and it ends up being a game of whack-a-mole in
>> > forks/branches so in general it's an order of magnitude less work to
>> > support U-Boot even though it's not perfect, but then nor is EDK2.
>>
>> I get it - trying to deal with more than one loader is a lot of extra
>> work.  I may still try to make an EDK2 RPM for the Pi 4, to work on my
>> particular issue... if I could get that to build in a Fedora-compatible
>> way, would that be something I could submit to Fedora?  I don't want to
>> make U-Boot life harder, but having the option (at least on select, aka
>> one, platforms) might be useful.
>> --
>> Chris Adams <li...@cmadams.net>
>> --
>> _______________________________________________
>> arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to arm-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to arm-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
-- 
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to arm-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to