ср, 6 янв. 2021 г. в 20:04, Matthias G. Eckermann <[email protected]>:

> Hello,
>
> On 2021-01-06 T 18:56 +0300 Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
>
> > I have a question on JeOS images being built for ARM boards. I
> > suppose that we agree that most target SBCs use microSD cards to
> > store and run the OS. There are exceptions though.
> >
> > Currently, half of JeOS images are supplied with ext4 and the other
> > half - btrfs.
>
> I think, this is based on personal choice of the person who creates
> the images...
>
> > And frankly speaking, I cannot figure out the rule why
> > some specific board receives JeOS with ext4 instead of btrfs or
> > vice-versa.  I suppose this was related somehow to btrfs support in
> > u-boot, right?
>
> Some historic background on the SUSE Linux Enterprise side (from
> around 2016): one of the reasons to use btrfs for microSD cards for
> SLES on RPi3 was that, combined with compression on the filesystem
> level, the number of IOPS needed is reduced, and booting (and other IO
> related activities) speeds up, as the cost of (de)compression is lower
> than the IO latency.
>

As far as I understand, you have to mount btrfs with `compress' option to
force the compression by default.
>From what I see in openSUSE JeOS, there is no `compress' in /etc/fstab by
default.


>
> So long -
>         MgE
>
> > Another consideration. Does anybody know any research on what FS is
> > the most friendly to SD cards?
>
> --
> Matthias G. Eckermann,    Director Product Management Linux Platforms
> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH - Maxfeldstr. 5 - 90409 Nürnberg
> (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)           Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
>


-- 
With best regards,
Matwey V. Kornilov

Reply via email to