{Blush}   The WSJ got the main point of the article wrong. Those who want to see an 
author approved summary can check out:  
http://www.brook.edu/views/papers/dickens/20000602.htm 

-- Bill

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/28/00 10:57AM >>>
There's a write-up on list member Bill Dickens on p.2 of today's Wall
St. Journal.  Check it out.
-- 
            Prof. Bryan Caplan               [EMAIL PROTECTED]    
            http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/bcaplan 

  "What a lot of trouble to prove in political economy that two and
   two make four; and if you succeed in doing so, people cry, 'It is
   so clear that it is boring.'  Then they vote as if you had never
   proved anything at all."
          --Frederic Bastiat, "What Is Seen and What is Not Seen"

Reply via email to