Some historical ponderings.

An American political philosopher friend of mine was wondering how market 
practices and institutions would have been affected had economic, cultural 
and political conditions been slightly different during the Industrial 
Revolution in Britain. For example, he speculates that the factory structure 
would have been less authoritarian had labour been more scarce and more 
dear. Any thoughts?

Also, a question: How vital was the economic exploitation of its colonies 
(esp. India) to the growth and development of British capitalism? Some 
people seem to believe it was extremely vital. Some that the British economy 
was already well-developed by the time the exploitation took effect.

Any thoughts? Are there any good books/articles on these subjects?

Chirag Kasbekar
MA (economics), University of Mumbai (Bombay), India



_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn.com.

Reply via email to