Armchairs,

The tide has been changing in recent decades, and it seems to me that the 
discourse on "market failures" is fading...
But what about "political market failures" --if politics can be seen as a 
market, that is.  The public/social choice pessimism on collective decision 
making looks pretty much like a "failure" kind argument...  but is that the 
case?

Why does Donald Wittman's (cfr "The mith of democratic failure") arguments 
are ipso facto ruled out as "naive panglossian view of the markets" by some 
scholars?
Who else is doing political economy work in Wittmanian lines?  Who has 
elaborated the best rebuttal to Wittman?

Etch

Reply via email to