This is classic Armchair stuff.

Could the products actually be different?  For example 1 firm might give
large trash cans to its customers for $25 - while another gives small trash
cans for $12 - then households self select  (though this does not explain
why 1 firm doesn't offer both of these deals, or charge by the pound or
container).

Also, there are 2 puzzles here - how did the world get this way, and why
doesn't it "revert" to what we would expect.

At a minimum, one would expect the firms to organize themselves within the
neighborhood (you take this street, I'll take that one) to take some level
of advantage of scale economies described.

>From the existence of the flyer it sounds like the situation with many firms
has been persevering for some time...

(Are you sure the student didn't make this up?)

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Sellgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, November 02, 2000 4:52 PM
Subject: garbage collection


>
>One of my students came to me with a puzzle.  In his community, garbage
>collection is a fairly competitive industry.  New residents are given a
>flyer listing 15 different collection companies.  They generally charge
>about $15/month for one collection per week.
>
>Why are there so many collection companies?  It would seem like there
>would be economies of scale.  For example, we could compare the costs of a
>monopoly to the costs of an ``average'' competitor above.  The competitor
>on average travels 15 times farther between stops.  This must consume
>quite a bit more fuel and take longer, although I would admit that much of
>the collectors' time is spent at any given stop.
>
>There is a public-policy puzzle as well:  The plenitude of competition
>increases the noise in the neighborhood.
>
>Thanks for any ideas.
>Andrew.
>
>
>---------------------------------
>Andrew Sellgren
>Department of Economics, MSN 3G4
>George Mason University
>Fairfax, VA  22030-4444
>
>Tel:   (703) 993-1124
>Fax:   (703) 993-1133
>Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Web:   http://sellgren.gmu.edu
>---------------------------------
>
>

Reply via email to