Other nobel prizes have been awarded to individuals that weren't formally trained. Some literature winners were not fiction writers, a recent physics went to an engineer and medicine/physiology often goes to non-MD biologists. If people started thinking contribution to economic thought, then we might open it up to people in b-schools, psychologists and others. thne it might get interesting. Fabio On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, jim horsman wrote: > > > > Not to be picky, (I guess I am) but, isn't Tullock a lawyer by primary > > credential and training > > sure, but we can define an economist as one who publishes in economic > journals. Not too many more prolific than Gordon. >
- Re: Handicapping the 2001 Noble Prize in Economics Alexander Guerrero
- Re: Handicapping the 2001 Noble Prize in Economics chris macrae
- Re: Handicapping the 2001 Noble Prize in Economics fabio guillermo rojas
- Re: Handicapping the 2001 Noble Prize in Economics Alex Tabarrok
- Re: Handicapping the 2001 Noble Prize in Economics dmitche4
- Re: Handicapping the 2001 Noble Prize in Economics William Dickens
- RE: Handicapping the 2001 Noble Prize in Economics Grey Thomas
- RE: Handicapping the 2001 Noble Prize in Economics Bill Dickens
- Re: Handicapping the 2001 Noble Prize in Economics jim horsman
- Re: Handicapping the 2001 Noble Prize in Economics fabio guillermo rojas
- Re: Handicapping the 2001 Noble Prize in Economics Technotranscendence
- Re: Handicapping the 2001 Noble Prize in Economics Bryan D Caplan
- Re: Handicapping the 2001 Noble Prize in Economics jklick
- RE: Handicapping the 2001 Noble Prize in Economics Grey Thomas
- RE: Handicapping the 2001 Noble Prize in Economics Grey Thomas
- RE: Handicapping the 2001 Noble Prize in Economics fabio guillermo rojas
- Re: Handicapping the 2001 Noble Prize in Economics Edward Lopez
