General rule on the costs of regualtion:  Every $15 mil. decline in wealth
leads to loss of 1statistical life.

See Lutter, Morall, and Viscusi
Economic Inquiry, Volume 37, Issue 4, pp. 599-608

>From Abstract:
"Using new empirical estimates for the income elasticity of many of the most
consequential risk-related behaviors, our results imply that a $15 million
decrease in income is associated with the loss of an additional statistical
life. Regulations that cost more than $15 million per expected life saved
will have counterproductive effects on individual mortality."

JC

PS- Good to see you around DeBacker.
_________________________
John-Charles Bradbury, Ph.D.
Department of Economics
The University of the South
735 University Ave.
Sewanee, TN 37383 -1000
Phone: (931) 598-1721
Fax: (931) 598-1145
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason DeBacker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 2:51 PM
Subject: Re: odds and terrorism


> One could also argue that the current bills being considered for airport
> security are killing people.  More bags scanned, more security workers,
and
> higher salaries for them will result in higher ticket prices.  This raises
> the cost of flying and thus more people drive on their vacations- a much
> riskier form of travel...
>
>
> Jason DeBacker
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alex Tabarrok" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 9:40 AM
> Subject: odds and terrorism
>
>
> > Here is a nice article on the odds of various events and terrorist
> > related odds.  It's familiar material to this audience but might make a
> > good discussion item in a class.
> >
> > Best
> >
> > Alex
> >
> >
> > http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A7812-2001Nov23.html
> > --
> > Dr. Alexander Tabarrok
> > Vice President and Director of Research
> > The Independent Institute
> > 100 Swan Way
> > Oakland, CA, 94621-1428
> > Tel. 510-632-1366, FAX: 510-568-6040
> > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>

Reply via email to