Sorry about the blank message- damn "enter" key :)

I have been thinking a good deal about the problem of pollution in an 
anarcho-capitalist society lately.  It has lead to many quick dead ends, 
but provided a few thoughts that I can't shut the door on, yet.

What about a private EPA(s)?  They would be private environmental 
regulatory agencies.  This would help lower the trasaction costs and, 
with private law establishing contracts of rights to pollute/not be 
polluted on, this could help lead to a Coasian solution.  The private 
EPA would make money by offering a service of testing for environmental 
degradation and then arbitrating with the polluters.  It would be held 
in check (i.e. not arbitrating for every little degredation) because 
arbitration costs.  

There may be many problems with this, but one that jumps out is the 
question: Does the Coase Theorem apply to externalities that are public 
bads/goods?  I mean, while people could bargain for an optimal solution 
IF tranaction costs were zero, would this happen for a public good?  
Wouldn't there still be the freerider problem?

Any thoughts?

Jason DeBacker


Reply via email to