> --- Bryan Etzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Would we have seen an increasing level of social unrest > > had capitalism been left alone? > > Has/was capitalism been saved?
Fred Foldvary wrote: > There seem to be two different meanings of "capitalism" here. > 1) "capitalism left alone" implies a pure market or close to it. > 2) "been saved" implies the mixed economy we have always had. No contradiction. Would social unrest increase if the market were, for once, left alone? Has compromise moderated the calls for its destruction? The questions are not obviously absurd. -- Anton Sherwood, http://www.ogre.nu/
