Here's a link to a NY Times article:

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/08/12/national/12MURD.html?ex=1030256121&ei=1&en=4ca972cf978300ff
 

It refers to a study by  Anthony R. Harris, published in the journal Homicide Studies. 
 He studies hospital admissions of assault victims, and finds that substantial 
advances in trauma care have reduced mortality among assault victims.  That is, given 
an assault, the victim who would have died in 1960 (becoming a murder statistic) 
survives the assault in the 1990s.  Thus, some  of the declining murder rate since the 
1960s may be attributable to better health care, not lessened murderous behavior.

Has anyone seen the study?  If so, does the finding appear genuine?  As the news 
article sums up, "[T]he study could raise questions about how
crime statistics are analyzed, and that researchers should
consider whether medical care has improved when assessing
local changes in crime rates."  Interesting stuff for the econ of crime folks.

Noel


Dr. Noel D. Campbell
Asst. Prof. of Business Administration
North Georgia College & St. Univ.
Dahlonega, GA 30597
(706)864-1621


Reply via email to