|
Interesting. A Neo-Marxist Conspiracy Theory,
from an economist's perspective, "It's all about OIL(Euro's)." My degree
is in Political Science, with an emphasis on International Relations. What
we learn in the Social Sciences is that things tend to be "over-determined,"
many not one cause. I think the conflict with Iraq falls within this
description. I am sure that economics plays SOME role, but not the
dominant role.
I
would posit that Saddam Hussein's actions since 1980 provide all the
justification necessary for apprehension and care necessary, by his neighbors
and the United States, without recourse to discussions of "Langley and
Washington" and geo-strategic analyses of oil. His invasions of Iran and
Kuwayt suggest the Ba'athist regime in Baghdad is an expansionist one. The
continued flouting of UN Resolutions suggests that the belligerence of the
regime has not abated.
We
might debate the merits of preemptive action, on moral and practical
grounds, but I do not think it is necessary to advance a "Big Finance-Big
Oil" basis to for discussion or opposition. To me, it seems, this is
merely "No Blood For Oil" tarted up in academese. It is a non-starter when
chanted on a street corner and it isn't much more convincing when advanced in a
news group.
|
- RE: why Iraq? here's one theory Gil Guillory
- Re: Fw: why Iraq? here's one theory William Dickens
- Re: Fw: why Iraq? here's one theory Wei Dai
- Re: Fw: why Iraq? here's one theory Bob Steinke
- RE: Fw: why Iraq? here's one theory Pinczewski-Lee, Joe (LRC)
- RE: Fw: why Iraq? here's one theory Grey Thomas
- Re: Fw: why Iraq? here's one theory Jacob W Braestrup
