I remember seeing the quote recently, just don't remember where. I'm tempted to think 
H.L. Mencken for some reason, though. Also just reread "Crisis and Leviathan" and 
suspect it might be from there if it's not Mencken. 

Daniel L. Lurker

"Actual happiness always looks pretty squalid in comparison with the 
over-compensations for misery. And, of course, stability isn't nearly so spectacular 
as instability. And being contented has none of the glamour of a good fight against 
misfortune, none of the picturesqueness of a struggle with temptation, or a fatal 
overthrow by passion or doubt. Happiness is never grand."

World Controller Mustapha, Brave New World -Aldous Huxley

----- Original Message -----
From: Grey Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, May 29, 2003 10:06 am
Subject: RE: [Forum] Quoth who?

> > > "Whenever a government creates a body to regulate a trade 
> > for the benefit
> > > of the people, the trade gains control of the body for the 
> > benefit of the
> > > trade at the expense of the people."
> > > 
> Sorry for no help in the particular, but I remember a paper I
> wrote 20 years ago making this point, and almost using those
> words.
> Let me here describe the individual mechanism (as I recall):
> The new gov't body has a head regulator.  He's new, he's
> important in DC.  Maybe he gets wined and dined by the
> politicians, he certainly gets noticed by the politicians, 
> and the news folk.
> For about a week.  Then the news is covering something else,
> the politicians have other crusades.
> The few, low paid pro-consumer lobbyists are glad HE's
> responsible, and trust him to do a good job.  Which he's
> trying to do.
> Of course, he HAS to talk with representatives of the regulated
> industry, to get basic info.  He makes a lunch appointment
> with "the enemy".
> But they're SO NICE!!!  They buy him lunch, they are polite,
> they are RESPECTFUL.  They care what he says, and agree he
> has good points.  Plus, if he's not sure of some basic
> data, they usually have the data, and provide it.
> They mostly agree with all his principles, but on just this
> one detail, they want the regulatory phrasing to be just a little
> different, since it gets "virtually" all the benefits at less
> cost, saving jobs, etc.  And nobody else knows or really cares
> about THAT detail, certainly not at the detailed level of the
> highly specialized experts, in the trade industry & the regulatory
> body.  
> And of course, the top politically appointed regulator prolly 
> won't be a regulator FOR EVER, but his detailed, expert knowledge
> of the industry, and its regulations, will SURELY make him very
> valuable to a future employee.
> ...
> The point is not so much that the "trade gains control of the body",
> (true), but that the body is seduced by the only serious 
> suitor -- the trade.
> How could it be otherwise?  (I believed it true then, have been
> libertarian since; and believe it now, too.)
> Tom Grey

Reply via email to