According to a recent article [1] in Harvard International Review, because
of differences in fertility, the population growth rate in dictatorships
is higher than that in democracies at every income level. It says "an
average woman has one-half of a child more under dictatorship than under
democracy." As a result of this faster population growth, dictatorships
have greater GDP growth even though they have lower per capita GDP growth
compared to democracies.

This information leads me to ask a couple of questions:

1. Why is fertility higher in dictatorships? Do dictators like bigger
populations, and democrats like smaller populations? Does population
growth influence choice of government? Or is there a third factor that
affects both fertility and form of government?

2. Should economists try to maximize GDP, or per capita GDP? If the former 
should they be supporting dictatorships?

Another interesting piece of information in this article is that 
democratic regimes are more frequent in more developed countries, but it's 
not because those countries are more likely to become democracies. Rather 
it's because they are less likely to revert back to dictatorships. Among 
democracies that have collapsed, the one with the highest per capita 
income is Argentina in 1975 -- US$6055.

[1] A Flawed Blueprint. By: Przeworksi, Adam. Harvard International 
Review, Spring2003, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p42.

Reply via email to