Dear Sahil,

First of all, thanks for sending this mail. Hats off to you for expressing 
your thoughts so beautifully and intelligently. It was the most moving mail 
I have read in a long time. I hope someday ARR finds enough time to read 
your mail!

It is evident that you FEEL his music and not merely listen. Over the years, 
I feel I have grown with his music which has matured and reached a stage 
where one wonders, how can he ever make this any better? Before you know it 
he composes a Meenaxi, then a Swades and then a Bose and answers your 
question. While we are left to absorb the subtle complexities of his 
creations, he moves on with his quest. Here's a legend who is perhaps the 
most underrated ever, probably because he achieved so much at his age.

Regards,
Sunil



>From: "ST" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [email protected]
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: [arr] Re: ARR&MUSIC!  (a possible answer to spiteful badmouthing 
>of ARR)
>Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 03:45:23 -0000
>
>Fellow ARR Fans (especially taurus8_0)
>
>In response to your rightful concern and comments about the direction
>of ARR music in recent times, I have few comments that you may (or may
>not) agree with. Everyone has their own reason for remaining a true
>fan of ARR. Here is mine.
>
>To me, the box office results in no way represent the quality of the
>movie or the talent of its producers. Many fantastic peices of work
>have bombed, and besides the odd ones like Laagan, ones that do well
>have little more than the classic bollywood story and style to offer.
>If it were not for ARR and very few other talented actors and
>directors, I would not be paying attention to bollywood films or
>music! And by same reason I do pay attention to ARR's tamil albums,
>despite being a Northie.
>
>Clearly, popular music in no way exacts musical talent. The beats and
>melody (if even) are purely icing that fade away sooner than the
>commercials promoting them. What I find most shameful about the
>industry is that 95% of the tunes are 1) unoriginal and repetitive of
>their older work and/or 2) blatantly stolen under the ideal of
>"inspired from.." and/or 3) of same or similar style with different
>instruments, arrangement, and singers and  ( either 4. lack the the
>notes that press the right keys to convey the right emotions OR 5.
>posses the notes to convey an emotion, however those that have become
>too obvious in the industry i.e. lack the range OR 6. do this job
>well, and I respect those rare few, but lack the magical x-factor that
>ARR has proved to be carrying since Roja )
>
>ARR's music, on the other hand, provides purity and shows integrity.
>First time I listen to any piece it is like an enigma. To an untrained
>ear like mine, it is a partial blurr. As I listen to it over and over,
>I uncover to more and more depth, what he is trying to convey in the
>song. The instruments, musical arrangement, background track, range of
>melodies, novelty of the overall work, and the special something he
>always fills up in the middle of the track. The more I hear, the more
>I discover what I was missing or misinterpreting when I had heard it
>before. It is a well known phenomenon that some or most of ARR's songs
>get better over time. And I remember reading his interview once where
>he provided a possible explanation saying that because they are
>generally completely new tunes and melodies that people have not
>imagined before, it takes time to digest.
>
>Now, as for the criticizm of his recent works, I say that those who
>find his recent efforts repetitive and unattractive just dont
>understand music to a level that is required to appreciate ARR. In his
>earlier days, when he came out with Roja, Thiruta Thiruda, Rangeela,
>Bombay, etc.. people cherished them because they were very differently
>composed to what they had been hearing for years, and in a good way. I
>doubt the entire fan base understood the elegance of his composition.
>Those that did (like us ofcourse ) are still his grateful fans. We
>still appreciate his talents and by no means are we blind worshipers.
>Blind are those who can not see the beauty in ARR's work.
>
>I concede that not all of his works appear attractive, original, and
>of the standard he has set himself. In my experience what appears
>today does not stand true for ARR's music tomorrow. And one more
>thing, the same kind of songs that people pick-out to badmouth him
>today were being produced in his early days also. E.g. Patti rap -
>Muqabla, Jor Laaga - Chor Chor, Jo manga tha - Kabhi na Khabhi.
>
>But after listening to them many times over the years I have realised
>even those that dont seem attractive on the surface possess ARR's raw
>talent, in some form or other.
>
>As for the recent works, do they not carry the genius of ARR? Some
>examples..picking out 2-3 at random from these recent albums.
>
>DJAK
>  - Jane Bahara - Listen to it in the right mood it will arouse unique
>feelings that is the mark of ARR sice Roja..also heads up to the
>lyrics (at some places). Can anyone else end a song as smoothly as
>this?
>  - Zindagi hai dua - forget the vocals and focus on the
>instrumentation.. just that use of greekish guitar with piano is the
>proof of his super talent.
>
>Lakeer
>   - Saadiya - "saadiya saadiya saadiya haai.." you dont find
>originality and talent in this? the way "naino ke shishe me saya hai
>kiska, luk chup ke chanda ke jaisa.. kashti yeh dil, kehti hai mil
>saagar hai ishq kaa..." is sung, you dont find these lines unique,
>extraordinary, and containing ARR's genius???? Listen to it again if
>you dont. And again, until you do because trust me if you've liked
>ARR's earlier works, sooner or later it will come to you.
>
>  - shehzade - not a big fan of these lyrics and little bit bombastic,
>but that seems to be the purpose of it. listen to about 1 min 30
>seconds.. and pure genius at 2:53 and overall does it not put you in
>different shoes? Listen to it few more times dude.
>
>Boys
>  - Listen to it from the point of view of the right audience and it is
>as innovative as his original work.
>  - Use of electric guitar in Secret of success only bolsters our
>beliefs that ARR makes good music in any genre. Oh and there is this
>great melody too, most noticeable mid way.
>  - Ale Ale - absolutely fantastic instrumentation and a great soothing
>melody, I really dont understand why anyone would consider ARR a flop
>after listening to this. And the way he is interlacing male and female
>vocals throughout the song is unheard of. provides fantastic effect,
>something i could not have imagined prior to listening to it.
>
>E20U18
>   Kama Kama - love the voice that sings kama kama in background.. I
>dont understand the lyrics, maybe thats what makes it more attractive
>;) And it makes me jump like a monkey.
>   Oru Nanbanirunthaaal - beeeautifuly sung by both vocals. I
>absolutely love the flow of the vocal melody. Calling it average is a
>gross understatement.
>   Yedo Yedo - A great MASTERPIECE by far, in the league of Tu hi re,
>yeh haseen vadiya, roja. Under right light this beautiful song is sure
>to mealt anyones heart.
>
>
>*** So now don't tell me that ARR has lost his talent. And frankly,
>true talent does not go away! If it appears so, then it was not a
>talent, just a fluke. ARR makes just as novel and beautiful melodies,
>provides just as crisp instrumentation, and extracts the best out of
>his very talented crew, which is why they stick around with him. It is
>the audience that is realising they never really understood the true
>essence of his music, they were simply floating over the surface.
>
>Shankar ehsan loy has made some good songs, but in no way do they
>posses eternal melodies - with notes so complex that they occupy our
>concious attention for a very long time, with notes so right for the
>human in you that they relentlessly juggle untried emotions, bringing
>us to tears or making us dance like a monkey.
>
>ARR does not seem to be taking on albums for more money or to score at
>the box office and win awards, he composes because he enjoys to, he
>takes on albums from north to keep us true fans fulfilled.
>
>Don't be ashamed for supporting ARR. Tell your friends it is they who
>are blind for not comprehending the genius in ARR. Box office flops
>are only a response of the "average" ear!
>
>
>An ardent fan of ARR's talents.
>-S
>
>
>
>
>
>
>--- In [email protected], "taurus8_0" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
> > HELLO GUYS!
> >
> > HAVE BEEN IN THE GROUP FER A VERY LONG TIME AND OBSERVING EACH AND
> > EVERYTHIN TAKIN PLACE IN THE GROUP.
> >
> > Hmm mainly wrote a msg 2 clarify about the Indian music scenario.
> >
> > Guys 1 ff my friends who seems 2 be in Bombay said there was an
> > article in a leadin newspaper which said that ARR has lost his
>touch
> > and hes no more delivering like before.
> >
> > Well to be very frank Guys lets stop all the biased comments and
> > accept the fact that ARR'S music of late is average barrin Bose.Bt
> > unfortunately even Bose had BOMBED heavily at the Box Office and
> > hence The music.
> >
> > The question now is wether ARR can deliver commerical Hits.2Be
>frank
> > Recently all his films had Bombed heavily and also his music.
> >
> > Guys Also his music in 'SWADES' was average.We have 2 accept
> > it.Meenaxi just above average.And Bose Gd bt nt excellent.Really
> > dont know why ARR accepts such movies where the scope for
>delivering
> > good music is minimumm.Why did ARR Accept projects like LAKEER DJAK
> > AND KISNA where he scored just few songs here and there.And Lakeer
> > was a below average album.
> >
> > Guys I really feel bad when my friends laugh at me sayin why the
> > hell do yu blindly support ARR and hes nt the same Num1 MD
> > again.THEY Say SHANKAR EHSAN LOY DELIVERS BETTER THAN ARR.
> >
> > Guys just think instead ff scoring few songs for each films ARR
>shud
> > have scred For a GD prject like ANNIYAN.If really ARR didnt work on
> > Anniyan just fer time it looks very funny hw come he worked on
>those
> > hindi projects which had no scope whtsever.
> >
> > GUYS EVEN IN TAMIL even though ARR gave some hits The films for
> > which he had scred music had Bombed heavily.The guys whu are in top
> > are VS YSR AND HJ.PPL ARE EVEN SAYIN ARR CAN NEVER CM 2 THE TOP
> > AGAIN.
> >
> > Guys They say flow in arr music is not there anymore.IF YU TAKE
> > ALBUMS like MAYMADHAM THRIUDA THIRUDA AND KADHAL DESAM AND COMPARE
> > THE ALBUMS NW it looks true.
> >
> > Is Arr tryin 2 give diff sounds in music and failin miserably?
> >
> > Will he go back 2 his old ways?
> >
> > IS ARR BEING UNLUCKY?
> >
> > WILL ARR JOIN WITH SHANKAR AGAIN?
> >
> > IS HE HAVIN A LT FF HEADWEIGHT?
> >
> > DOES HE HAVE A PROPER TEAM?
> >
> > AS ARR FANS WE HAVE 2 PASS ON THE MSG 2 ARR AND TELL HIM 2 LOOK
>BACK
> > AT COMPOSIN PROPER MUSIC.
> >
> > MST FF THE GUYS WETHER YU ACCEPT OR NOT ARR IS NOT THE NUM1 ANYMORE
> > UNTIL HE GETS BACK 2 THE BASIC AGAIN.
> >
> > GUYS THIS IS PERSONAL OPINION AND NT MEANT 2 HURT ANY1.BT THE ABOVE
> > IS A PUBLIC OPINION.HEHEHEHEE
> >
> > Bye,
> >
> > ARR FAN
>
>
>
>


*************************************
Sunil Nair
ISTD (Solutions), ADCO
P.O. Box 270, Abu Dhabi
United Arab Emirates
Mobile: (+97150) 7802783
Website: http://www.sunilnair.com

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
In low income neighborhoods, 84% do not own computers.
At Network for Good, help bridge the Digital Divide!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/c9hWNA/3MnJAA/n1hLAA/iyUplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

Explore, Experience, Enjoy A.R.Rahman - The Man, The Music, The Magic.
Only at arrahmanfans - The definitive A.R.Rahman e-community.

Homepage: http://www.arrahmanfans.com
To Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arrahmanfans/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to