Dear Amit Goel

THANK YOU for your encouraging words about recent performance of The 
Wandering Souls. This pat-on-the-back, will help the group to continue 
on their mission to take RAHMAN's music and message to the like-minded 
persons. 

Also noted your suggestion on "not playing Bombay Theme". However, 
personally I will differ with your views on BOMBAY THEME. I find this 
theme is the healing sound which may emanate from the churning of the 
horrors of fights over various divides. This group has played Bombay 
theme everytime they performed on stage and each time the members from 
audiance have come forward and informed us the emotional effect this 
theme had on them and the changes they felt the theme brought within 
them.

For me, Bombay Theme is the very core of RAHMAN's music. Emotional, and 
touching as you rightly said....

I personally do not want the group to stop playing the Bombay theme 
unless we find staring at dead end on the instrumentation or live 
artist front. The group has MASTERED the theme very well and is one of 
the highlights of the programme. Nevertheless, the decision is  
entirely of TWS group and your suggestion will be passed on to the 
group chiefs.

Best regards
Dinesh Vaidya
The Wandering souls 

--- In [email protected], "amit goel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was one of the thousands of lucky ppl to attend Rahmania, and was 
> impressed by the devotion, skill and adventure of these Punelads. It 
> was amazing. This was perhasps ONE occasion when the group attempted 
> what even Rahman seldom does- and that is the rendition of the Bombay 
> Theme. I was touched by the remarks and introduction, for what else 
> could have been more secular ever ? But i did feel that the Theme 
> needs much more , like, in a roaring audience who prefers the Rahman 
> Vocals (whetevr ppl may say abt the purity, language being a 
negative, 
> etc) the Theme was far too serious a subject to be proffered at the  
> platform. 
> 
> This music of the theme is religon, so, i will make a humble 
> suggestion that this be kept out of future performances.
>


Reply via email to