Good point!
--- In [email protected], Gopal Srinivasan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Anyone who writes "while rest of the tracks is(sic) classy but
situational or mediocre in terms of compositions or presentations
(sic)", in my view, has no business writing reviews. How does one
reconcile classy with mediocre in the same sentence?
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> > From: Chord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [email protected]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 1:42:49 AM
> > Subject: [arr] Glamsham reviews JA music
> >
> > I guess both sides need to be shown.
> >
> > http://www.glamsham.com/music/reviews/22-music-review-jodha-akbar-
> > 010815.asp
> >
> > It's quite disconcerting that this reviewer calls In Lamho Ke and
Man
> > Mohanna "Mediocre, Uninspiring, Lacklustre, Average". I really
really
> > wish people could take the context of the film in mind when
reviewing
> > music instead of just posting knee-jerk reactions to whether the
music
> > is catchy or not.
> >
> > There seems to be a more evident split between classes and masses
with
> > this album, which I had partially expected. If you check the
comments
> > section under the rediff review, you will know what I mean.
> > Unfortunately, this is not what Rahman wanted as he had hoped
that the
> > music would cater to a wide audience.
> >
> >
> >
> > Are you searching for a reason, to be kind?
> >
> > Explore, Experience, Enjoy A.R.Rahman - The Man, The Music, The
Magic.
> > Only at arrahmanfans.com - The definitive A.R.Rahman e-community.
> >
> > Homepage: http://www.arrahmanfans.com
> > Admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
