I believe they will publish Sudhish kamath's version
next friday in the Chennai edition.
--- Gopal Srinivasan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>                  
> This one thrills neither historians nor connoisseurs
>                                                     
>                                                     
>                                                     
>                                                     
>                                                     
>                   
> 
> 
>                                                  
>                                                     
> Recreating history: Hrithik Roshan and Aishwarya
> Raiin Jodhaa Akbar.                                 
>                                                   
> Jodhaa Akbar (Hindi)
> Director: Ashutosh Gowariker
> Cast: Hrithik Roshan, Aishwarya Rai, Sonu Sood,
> Poonam Sinha
> No man is a chessboard. In each one of us, greys
> abound. Unless of course, one is watching Ashutosh
> Gowariker’s Jodhaa Akbar.Here Akbar, arguably the
> great Mughal emperor, is a paragon ofperfection. He
> does not lose a battle and towers above the rest
> withhis moral stature. Sorry, Akbar needs no brownie
> points from posterity.Gowariker is a poor student of
> history. The film is so glaringlydeficient in the
> most obvious of things that you wonder if the
> directorwas trying to mock at history. Or is it a
> deliberate subversion of thetruth? 
> Agreed, there has been a debate, largely avoidable
> though, whetherJodhaa was Akbar’s wife or
> daughter-in-law. A common cinemagoer canleave it to
> historians to thrash it out, but where Gowariker
> failsmiserably – his third film in a little over
> six years, after Lagaan and Swades– is in
> attention to elementary details. Relating the
> untapped romanceof the Mughal Emperor and his Rajput
> wife, the film lacks integrity. 
> Gowariker takes too many liberties with history in
> the name of
> artistic licence. His devout souls at the dargah are
> all carefully
> clean-shaven, like those ads for men’s lotions.
> This in an age and at a
> place where a beard was the preferred way. And his
> emperor even does a
> little jig at the end of a song. Then walks the
> garden path with the
> ladylove in another sequence. All this is a
> throwback to more ordinary
> romances of commoners. Akbar is not spared any
> dignity. 
> So many negatives. Yes, but like life, here too
> there is a little
> silver lining. Hrithik Roshan may not fit the
> stereotypes of Akbar, but
> he is fine in action. He is a decent actor who
> manages to look good
> simply because his counterpart Aishwarya Rai refuses
> to do even the
> bare minimum. She is vapid all through, making
> Hrithik look almost
> outstanding in comparison. Unfortunately, Gowariker
> does not invest his
> hero with too much detail. He comes across as a man
> who could do no
> wrong. And we never get to see the human side of the
> redoubtable man.
> And Deen-e-Ilahi is non-existent here.
> Watch Jodhaa Akbar as a masala entertainer, andyou
> may not be too disappointed despite its poor
> editing, inordinatelength. The big canvas will
> appeal to some, the cinematography toothers as would
> the song “Jashn-e-bahara hai”. 
> Looking for a masterpiece of history with the past
> throbbing with
> life? You might have to wait till eternity. This one
> thrills neither
> the historians nor connoisseurs. 
> ZIYA US SALAM
> 
> 
> 
>
http://www.hindu.com/2008/02/17/stories/2008021750840200.htm
> 
> 
> 
> 



      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

Reply via email to