Hi guys,
I do not know if this has been posted earlier or not.
I found this review very intresting.
It gives us an idea what other countries or societies think of our
country and our cinema (I hate calling it Bollywood).
Also, somewhere in review you will find that they are curious as well
 to know what we think about them and their cinema.
Here is the link:

http://www.christiananswers.net/spotlight/movies/2008/jodhaaakbar2008.html

Featuring:      Hrithik Roshan (Jalaluddin Mohammad Akbar), Aishwarya Rai
(Jodhaa Bai), Sonu Sood, Kulbhushan Kharbanda, Suhasini Mulay, Raza
Murad, Punam Sinha, Rajesh Vivek, Pramod Moutho, Ila Arun, Surendra
Pal, Visshwa Badola, Prathmesh Mehta, Shaji Chaudhary, Manava Naik,
Disha Vakani, Abeer Abrar, Indrajit Sarkar, Aman Dhaliwal, Nikitin
Dheer, Pradeep Sharma, Balraj, Sudhanshu Hakku, Digvijay Purohit, Uri,
Sayed Badrul Hasan, Dilnaaz Irani, Tejpal Singh Rawat, Shehzor Ali,
Ulhas Barve, Jassi Singh, Raju Pandit, Bharat Kumar, Rajiv Sehgal,
Gurmmeet Singh
Director:       Ashutosh Gowarikar
Producer:       Ashutosh Gowarikar, Ronnie Screwvala
Distributor:    UTV Motion Pictures

"a sixteenth century love story about a Mughal emperor and a Rajput
princess"

Producer's Synopsis: "`Jodhaa Akbar' is a sixteenth century love story
about a marriage of alliance that gave birth to true love between a
great Mughal Emperor, Akbar and a Rajput princess, Jodhaa.
Politically, success knew no bounds for Emperor Akbar, After having
secured the Hindu Kush, he furthered his realm by conquest until his
empire extended from Afghanistan to the Bay of Bengal, and from the
Himalayas to the Godhavari River. Through a shrewed blend of
tolerence, generosity and force, Akbar won the allegiance of the
Rajputs, the most belligerent Hindus. But little did Akbar know that
when he married Jodhaa, a fiery Rajput princess, in order to further
strengthen his relations with the Rajputs, he would in turn be
embarking upon a new journey—the journey of true love.

The daughter of King Bharmal of Amer, Jodhaa resented being reduced to
a mere political pawn in this marriage of alliance, and Akbar's
biggest challenge now did not merely lie in winning battles, but in
winning the love of Jodhaa—a love hidden deep below resentment and
extreme prejudice. `Jodhaa Akbar' is their untold love story."

"Jodha Akbar" is an epic romance made in India. It stars former Ms.
World and "Queen of Bollywood" Aishwarya Rai and Hrithik Roshan. The
story is based on a true story about a Rajput Hindu princess who is
married to the Muslim leader Akbar in a political marriage. As time
passes, the two learn about true love and tolerance.
Bollywood for the Uninitiated

Before the actual review I think it is important to initiate some into
Bollywood. Bollywood is the name given to the Indian movie industry.
It is the second largest in the world behind the U.S. and certainly
the most unique. Unlike the other film industries of the world, India
clearly has its own distinct style marked by several features.

First, Bollywood films are usually much more family friendly than
Hollywood or other international films. There is almost never a sex
scene, nor nudity, nor for that matter even a clear kissing scene. In
fact, India censored a kissing scene from a recent movie. Some readers
may even remember that there is a warrant for the arrest of Richard
Gere for laying a big fat kiss on one of their actress' neck in
public. Consequently, parents rarely need to worry about their kids,
save the occasional cuss word which Indians seem to think is a regular
part of the English language (the Hindi language is often mixed with
English) and violence.

The second feature of Bollywood films is that most are musicals. Even
in a horror film it is not uncommon to see the stars stop and start
singing and dancing. The musical numbers, however, are not typical of
American musicals but have a style all their own. It is hard to
describe except that they often feature flashy costumes, a unique
dancing style, and music that is a mixture of many genres, but still
distinctly Indian.

Bollywood also usually features (but not always) a strong sense of
humor. Few movies in Bollywood are pure dramas ("Jodhaa Akbar" is an
exception). If anyone has ever seen a movie by Indian born director M.
Night Shayamalan, you will be familiar with the unique style of humor
Indians are born with. Satire and humor are mainstays of Bollywood
films; even in the melodramatic of movies.

Bollywood films are often accused of overacting and overdramatizing,
but this is intentional. Bollywood films seek to dramatize through
emotion rather than sheer realism. With a few exceptions Bollywood
fans should not expect to see a 'slice of life' in Bollywood movies,
but a dramatization of life.

Finally, Bollywood films are never short. They try to give you your
money's worth. With as much as thirty minutes or more worth of songs,
the average movie is nearly three hours in length. The good news is
that, unlike American cinema, Indian cinema features intermissions.
Since this is the time that people buy popcorn and cokes, it is odd
that more American movies still refuse to have intermissions for long
films (like the Lord of the Ring trilogy), but should you see a
Bollywood film in the local theater, asks whether or not the
intermission is retained.

If the reader has never seen a Bollywood film, and is reluctant to
shell out $10 for one, then I recommend starting with the English
tribute to Bollywood 'Bride and Prejudice' starring Aishwarya Rai, the
'Queen of Bollywood,' and directed by the woman who brought us 'Bend
It Like Beckham.' If you enjoy it, then you might try true Bollywood
films like 'Kabhi Kushi Kabhi Gham,' 'Kuch Kuch Hota Hai,' or
'Veer-Zaara.'
"Jodhaa Akbar" Review

"Jodhaa Akbar" is a historical drama set in the sixteenth century. It
is also the most expensive Bollywood film ever produced at $10,000,000
American. However, that $10,000,000 goes much further in India and the
movie has the look and feel of a $100,000,000 epic in the U.S. "Jodhaa
Akbar" is filmed on location at many beautiful sites including some
scenes at the famed Agra fort. The costumes and sets are beautiful as
well. The film has the look and feel of a great epic and the musical
interludes do not seem out of place as one might assume. The best song
is presented as part of a festival to honor Akbar; thus it fits in
perfectly. Aishwarya Rai is perfect at the beautiful Jodhaa and
Hrithik Roshan performs well as the Muslim king. From a cinematic
standpoint the only real criticisms include some cliches, such as a
'mauno e mauno' showdown at the end of the movie and the runtime which
is well over three hours. Will Americans sit in the theater reading
captions for over three hours? Experts have already suggested that the
answer to this question will determine the future of Bollywood epics.

>From a moral stance the first ten minutes of the film should carry a
strict warning for parents. The opening battle scenes are graphic and
include an elephant stepping on someone's head, another elephant
stepping on someone's chest causing him to cough up spurts of blood, a
severed arm flying through the air with blood splattering, and
numerous other violent battle scenes. However, after these graphic
opening scenes the movie is strictly a mild PG affair thereafter, but
parents should be very aware that the nature of these early scenes is
the equivalent of an R rated movie. There is also the odd addition of
a homosexual/transvestite man serving as the head eunuch. In reality
such a thing would never have occurred and it feels very odd and
anachronistic. Outside of this there is little of a strictly moral
issue to offend. Even the love scenes are done without sex or kissing.
In fact, the only time Akbar's lips touch Johdaa's is when he kisses
her on the forehead. You can, however, see some cleavage and Hrishik
has a scene reminiscent of Conan the Barbarian where he flexes his
bare muscles while practicing with a sword.

The greater issue is not moral but religious. The theme of the film is
tolerance, but its depiction goes beyond history and may actually
serve to be self defeating by promoting a naive view of Islamic
dynasties. This is not to say that Akbar the Great was not a great
Muslim ruler in the context of his times, nor does this alter the
enjoyability of the film, but it is relevant inasmuch as both India
and the U.S. are fighting against Islamic extremists.

Even before "Jodhaa Akbar" hit the theater it was hit with controversy
over its historical accuracy, or lack thereof. The Rajput community
has traditionally been ashamed of the fact that one of their kings
'sold' off their daughters to Muslim kings in the name of peace.
Unlike the film, the Rajput princesses (Akbar had nine wives) were
required to convert to Islam before the marriage. In the film Akbar
does not require her to convert to Islam and even builds a Hindu altar
for her in the Harem. He tells his soldiers not to force the
conversion of their subjects, goes through a Hindu wedding ceremony
with Jodhaa, and gives a wonderful lecture on honoring his subjects
regardless of their religion. Unfortunately, much of this is an
exaggeration of the facts. Akbar did lift the tax on Hindus and
refused to tear down their temples, but Jodhaa did convert to Islam
before the marriage and he did not build any Hindu altars. This
depiction of Akbar serves the purpose of the film in promoting
tolerance, but also promotes a naive view of Islam. Consider the
remark in the film that 'Islam gives women equal rights to pursue
divorce.' It is possible that Akbar gave such rights to women (I could
not confirm this) but few Islamic societies give women any such
rights. In fact, Sharia law gives the man the right to beat his wife,
or even murder her if she 'shames' him. In Saudi Arabia a woman was
recently arrested, stripped, and beaten for sitting with a man at
Starbucks when she was not married to him. The nobility of the film is
welcome, but the reality is that India is in the same war on terror as
America, and Islamic extremists are the enemy. We cannot fool
ourselves into believing that most Islamists are tolerant.
Where to see it

Chances are "Jodhaa Akbar" will not be playing you local cinemaplex.
You may find it at an arthouse theater or perhaps a Hollywood Theater
chain if you lucky. Additionally, if you happen to live in the Dallas,
Houston, Chicago, or Maryland areas then you can look up Funasia which
plays Bollywood movies. They are the only major movie houses to carry
Bollywood films in America, so if you don't live in these areas and
don't have a Hollywood Theater complex near you then you may have to
wait until it comes out on DVD and get it from Netflix or a similar
outlet. Nevertheless, the fact that "Jodhaa Akbar" is playing in
America at all is a good sign for the Bollywood film industry which
seems to be reaching its golden years, while Hollywood's golden years
were left far behind in the 30s and 40s.

Violence: Heavy / Profanity: None / Sex/Nudity: None

See list of Relevant Issues—questions-and-answers.

Viewer CommentsSend your comments

Positive - This movie had it all, epic battle scenes, intrigue,
romance, betrayal, beautiful costumes, Indian music... I was pleased
with the way marriage was portrayed so nobly by the main character,
and the honor with which he treated his wife and others. The movie was
very clean, but very romantic at the same time. The story is based on
an Islamic ruler taking a Hindu bride so the the film is replete with
images of the worship of these false gods. This could be offensive to
some Christians. What was also distressing was the comparison with so
many of Hollywood's offerings, where marriage is treated with distain,
and intimacy between men and women is portrayed so often in a trashy
way. I am wondering why America, with a Christian heritage, is
seemingly more advanced into degradation in their entertainment
offerings, and what other nations think of us and Christianity as a
result.
My Ratings: Moral rating: Better than Average / Moviemaking quality: 4.5
—Diane, age 51 

Reply via email to