I wonder what is this all fuss about. I justed listed the Michael Learns To Rock's song, and sincerely could not find even the 2-3 seconds similarity between the two songs. To say "copied" or "not original" is tooooooo explicit a statement.
--- In [email protected], || V i s h w e s h || <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Kishore... whats with the bold font all the time?? > It's pretty hard to read... so pls write in normal > font man... > > --- kishore parayath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > *Better CHANGE the TITLE.... Please DONT prove > > yourself a JOKER by telling > > that a VERY VERY VAGUE CO-incidential similarity > > makes d song un-original... > > * > > *Well....Do understand one thing....Our master, ARR > > always checks Yahoo > > groups, Whenever he gets time... So please dont > > SURPRISE him with jokes.... > > * > > ** > > *As I said, "ARR is one of the VERY FEW COMPOSERS in > > thw world who are 100% > > ORIGINAL!!"* > > > > > " The search is more important than the destination " > > - a r rahman - >
