Rajini produced Baba, and that had music by ARR.  I think Rajini, if
he has a say in the matter, will generally go for the hot music
directors at the time.

--- In [email protected], "Vijay Anand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> i dont think Rajini prefers our Boss, its only Directors who preferred.
> Muthu and Padaiyappa by K.S.Ravi kumar and Sivaji by Shankar.
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 9:46 AM, mohammed sajin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> >  After Baasha and Arunaachalam only, this combo come
> > together.....................
> >
> > yes that is a known thing, that Superstar always prefer our
> > boss.......................
> >
> > And I dont think Chandramukhi is a lose for ARR.................
> >
> > --
> > SAJIN
> > .
> > .
> > To err is human, to forgive... unlikely.
> > ------------------------------
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> > From: Vithur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [email protected]
> > Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2008 9:48:46 AM
> > Subject: Re: [ARR] CHANDRAMUKHI - Why did ARR reject Chandramukhi
> >
> >  Where did u get the news that ARR was approached for this
project... Not
> > all Rajni sir movies have ARR. It all depends on the production
company, and
> > the Director..
> >
> > Arunachalam had DEVA , Baasha had DEVA
> >
> > Sivaji prductions which produced Chandramukhi didnt approach ARR
at all..
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 8:15 PM, kishore parayath <kishore.parayath@
> > gmail.com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> >
> >>    Hi friends,
> >>
> >> We all know, when superstar Rajnikanth plans a project, he always
wants
> >> ARR as the composer.. After shelving Jaggubhai,(Which had Music
by ARR),
> >> Rajini went to work on CHANDRAMUKHI.
> >>
> >> Did ARR reject the project??
> >> Some say that he had gone to Ilayaraaja, who declined it and
suggested
> >> Vidyasagar in his place..
> >>
> >> What is the truth??
> >>
> >> This is a longterm doubt in me friends...Please clarify.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > regards,
> > Vithur
> >
> > ARR -- The Sweet Cube always
> >
> > 
> >
>


Reply via email to