Stay humble guys. humble.

On 1/29/09, rayrai2k <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>   What else can he say I have always seen him in drowsy state always.
> And did you listen to comment from Sonu Nigam.
> Now he hardly finds any song to sing in Bollywood and he is still
> exist because he finds more opportunity in Bangalore than Mumbai.
> Lalit Pandit why would somebody ask him to answer on music he cannot
> judge one proper singer or singing in reality shows. His statement
> itself says everything about him "Jagjit jab bhi bolte hain, kammaal
> ki baat bolte hain"... My comment to him
> kabhi khud ki baat toh bolde kabhi.. gaane toh kisi aur se bana leta
> hain (Atleast speak your own words, Songs are however done by somebody
> else.. now its known who did score the title track for DDLJ & Kuch
> Kuch hota hain, which became a trademark of JL)
>
> --- In [email protected] <arrahmanfans%40yahoogroups.com>,
> Arijit Debnath <arijit...@...> wrote:
> >
> > Jagjit didn't space Gulzar also....I think he didn't get enough time
> to bash
> > all the other associates related to SM.....
> >
> > What a vulger language he used like hosh chore to Rahman can compose
> > Ghazals..... This guy lost all respect from me.....
> >
> > Arijit
> >
> > 2009/1/29 Anil Nair <rhythmca...@...>
> >
> > > And here comes the video :-)
> > > http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/videoshow/4045257.cms
> > >
> > > -A
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Thulasi Ram <karoke...@...> wrote:
> > >
> > >> cough cough! :)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Anil Nair <rhythmca...@...> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Didn't expect Jagjit Singh to say this ...or maybe its just
> yet again
> > >>> the "media monster" at work
> > >>>
> > >>> -A
> > >>>
> > >>> http://movies.indiainfo.com/2009/01/28/0901280633_gazals.html
> > >>>
> > >>> What does Rahman know about ghazals? Wednesday, January 28,
> 2009 06:31
> > >>> [IST]
> > >>>
> > >>> Mumbai:
> DNA<http://movies.indiainfo.com/2009/01/28/0901280633_gazals.html#>,
> > >>> in association with Rotary Club of Hiranandani Estate, Thane,
> brings on
> > >>> stage the legendary ghazal maestro to recreate the magic of the
> music<http://movies.indiainfo.com/2009/01/28/0901280633_gazals.html#>
> form.
> > >>> On the eve of Jagjit Singh Live in
> Concert<http://movies.indiainfo.com/2009/01/28/0901280633_gazals.html#>
> (at
> > >>> the Shanmukhananda Auditorium), the veteran exponent of ghazals
> rues the end
> > >>> of their era in Hindi films.
> > >>>
> > >>> Jagjit is not singing any film songs currently because he feels
> there is
> > >>> a lack of taste on the part of today's filmmakers and music
> directors. "They
> > >>> don't know what ghazals are all about and they lack good taste
> in music.
> > >>> What does AR Rahman know about ghazals? He will never use a
> ghazal in his
> > >>> films. All they do is pick up tunes from the West," he says.
> > >>>
> > >>> He criticises contemporary music directors for ruining the
> Indianness of
> > >>> sound. "Earlier, in the 60s and 70s, 90% of the music was based
> on the
> > >>> ghazal. Today, there's no poetry phrasing, it's all Western and
> the language
> > >>> is tapori -- a mix of English and Hindi. What kind of lyrics are
> Pappu
> > >>> can't
> dance<http://movies.indiainfo.com/2009/01/28/0901280633_gazals.html#>
> > >>> saala?"
> > >>>
> > >>> Yet the popularity of the form endures. He says, "My audience
> has only
> > >>> grown over the years. I always improvise and add variations to
> my old songs
> > >>> on stage. Every ghazal is re-born on that day."
> > >>>
> > >>> Interestingly, Jagjit only performs for a cause. On January 29,
> at the
> > >>> DNA and Rotary concert, he will perform to provide midday meals for
> > >>> children. He says, "I never give dates to concerts which are just
> > >>> money-making measures. I want to give back to the society. So I
> give my
> > >>> dates only to charity concerts."
> > >>> --
> > >>> -A
> > >>> http://viewsnmuse.blogspot.com
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > -A
> > > http://viewsnmuse.blogspot.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> 
>

Reply via email to