Chris, Can you read my mail again?. I am saying now it sounds simple. At that time entire country( which includes me ) was awestruck by the completly new sound. But the point of discussion if Roja like album is released today what would be reaction.
--- In [email protected], Chris Raj <chris78_...@...> wrote: > > > Roja was technically brilliant album and it was trend setting digital music > in indian film industry it was not a simple score as u said. > Just listen to other MD's albums in same period 92' . roja is altime > favourite for ARR himself. > _chris > > Nagaraj wrote: > > few days back I listened to Roja.. Though I liked it I felt it was > > too simple..The main reason for that is our ears are right now tuned to > > different style of music..espicially due to complex arrangements our boss > > did after 2000. I was just thinking if he did Roja rite now > > it would not be as popular as it was 1992. Max it can become a hit. > > So we are better of getting smthng like Yuvvraj ( my personal fav post > > 2000) or anythng new. > > Please note Roja still remains one of his best works ever but I just feel > > we ( and non rahmanic normal/common people as well) are better of getting > > smthng completely new instead. > > --- In arrahmanfans@ yahoogroups. com , Anish Gupte <musimax2000@ ...> > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi ,It'll be great if rahman can do that, however I feel that Roja is now > >> more than 15 years old...music has evolved and rahman has evolved...it' ll > >> be > >> great if rahman can create an album having Roja's significance but in sync > >> with todays music style and vibe. He has undoubtedly made several such > >> albums since then. > >> > >> Cheers > >> Anish > >> > >> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 2:07 AM, partha_sachin <partha_sachin@ ...>wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > Hi Folks, > >> > > >> > I was thinking for a long time now whether ARRji can create another > >> > 'ROJA'? > >> > If YES, I want ONE. Who all else think like me. Please pour in your > >> > thoughts. > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > P'ARR'THA. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >
