> Why is an ARR song picturization off topic? may be because this forum is to discuss ARR's music not films.
> Sorry to offend an Akshay fan. :-) :-) :-) lol. i am not an Akshay fan. it was just a joke at Kylie given that both are of same age (41) :-) - Jahanzeb --- In [email protected], V S Rawat <vsra...@...> wrote: > > On 8/29/2009 3:23 AM India Time, _jahanzebtippu_ wrote: > > > i fully agree. but then may be boss should not do these type of > > projects where he has to compromise a lot for the sake of big budget > > or mass appeal. similar thing happened with Ghajini too. but still i > > must say given boss's post-Oscar image + huge budget/hype of project > > + Kylie etc etc, everyone expects him to come up with something > > extra-ordinary, something of his standards and at the same time > > mass-appealing. and chiggy wiggy is kind of a let down in that > > respect. > > I again say that ARR, like all of us, lives in a commercial world. The > grocery man charges him and us money to give wheat and rice. He, like > us, has to earn for that and also to make provisions for old age and > other current and future responsibilities. Everybody must be knowing > several real life incidents of one time top names of bollywood spending > a penniless old age. > > So, it is perfectly OK for him to earn money that he gets. He has > striven life long to earn such a place for himself now when he can call > shots. By demanding his due share, he is setting bollywood practices > right side ,up otherwise the financiers/ producer will pocket all profit > leaving the actual performers and visualizers rot in slums. > > > It is for us, the fans, to give concessions wherever we see such > commercial impacts affecting his work. It is up to us to be wise and > tolerant and not to expect much from a Blue but we should have trust > that he will come up again with a Guru or Delhi-6 or 1947Earth wherever > he gets freedom to have his way. > > > > > little off topic but true that song picturization is kinda lame. > > Why is an ARR song picturization off topic? > > > where's that all money they have put? the set, the costumes, the > > extras etc everything looks from an average budget film. and btw if > > he is uncle than she truly is aunti since years ago :) > > Sorry to offend an Akshay fan. :-) :-) :-) > > He is turning 42 in 10 days, btw. I think even political parties > consider 35 as the top age after which a person is no longer in YUVA arm. > > > > > > > - Jahanzeb > > -- > Rawat > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], V S Rawat <vsrawat@> wrote: > >> On 8/28/2009 1:39 PM India Time, _Matthew Islam_ wrote: > >> > >>> Trust this from someone who knows, the soundtrack is rocking > >>> enough within the bounds of the script!!! > >> My hunch is also the same. "within the bounds of the script" is > >> going to be the key factor for the music of this film. When too > >> much money gets dumped in, people (producer/ director) shy away > >> from taking risks, doing experimentation, giving freedom to others > >> in doing their work. ARR by nature is a shy and sensitive man, he > >> would sense this that he is included in this project only because > >> of his brand value and not for the quality of his work. Kylie was > >> roped in for the same reason. > >> > >> You just see how unimaginative is the choreography. Girl singing > >> softly and emotionally and the boy (rather uncle) jumps in with all > >> hulla gulla brouhaha. 100s of songs have followed this pattern (on > >> screen). Even some Shammi Kapoor B&W songs had better video than > >> this. -- > >> > >> btw, the film was supposed to be 100% underwater. Is that a > >> submarine discotheque or what? :-) > >> > >> -- Rawat >
