Well said Purevibz!. And also lets not forget critical bias. We in this group inherently like rahmans music. So we want to like his compositions and we work our way through it. Rather than getting a pure outside-in view, which no fan base gives. Frankly, i think BLUE turned out poor in many ways, even the audio was loud (not bad, just loud). Don;t know what happened.
To: [email protected] From: [email protected] Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:07:04 +0000 Subject: Re: [arr] Such Bull! "I think it also puts on a question mark on the credibility of this group" I diagree with this 100%. Differing opinions don't discredit a group, but merely enhance it. "then we can't hide from the fact that other people might be looking at this group to get authentic feedback on the "goodness" of his songs, and all those got misguided by this group's endless advertising Chiggy Wiggy and entire bullu." There is nothing wrong in expressing praise and enthusiasm for a song that one likes, even if many others don't like it. People have different opinions and that is that. Nobody is forcing anyone to like or dislike the song. "The reason might be: We fans might like anything given by our man because we love our man. It is normal human psychology. We might have convinced ourselves that we are liking Chiggy Wiggy or blue on some strengths it has while ignoring some down points it is having." Yes, good point. We must try not to be blind fans and critical analysis is always good up to a point. However, if someone expresses like a for a song that many dislike, let it be. Why challenge someone's opinion? I have learned this lesson too. If you like Chiggy Wiggy, then you like it. Whether a song has up points or down points is up to you. THat's the nature of music. One man's noise may be another man's symphony. "I hope members will learn from this and will try to be more objective in giving their future reviews/ feedbacks on future releases of ARR. Remember, wrong feebacks in this group must be presenting a wrong picture about a song/ album to ARR himself if he is accessing the group. ARR needs truth. Underved praising will harm ARR. Let's not only utter Satyamev Jayate, but also practice it." We are hear to express our thoughts and feelings about ARR's music. What is true to some may not be true to others. If one likes a song that you don't like, it doesn't make him or her bad, wrong, or giving ARR bad feedback. When it comes down to the quality of a song, there is no "truth", but only taste, preference, and opinion. Yes, there can be a large consensus about how a song is liked or disliked, but ultimately, we all have different perceptions and we should leave it at that. Now, when it comes to things like sound quality and technical matters, then yes, there is such a thing as objectivity here and ARR should receive feedback on those points. --- In [email protected], V S Rawat <vsra...@...> wrote: > > On 10/18/2009 4:51 AM India Time, _Jahanzeb_ wrote: > > > exactly. this is what i have been saying all the time, that Chiggy Wiggy is > > a huge failure of ARR. > > and yes though people didn't agree that it is a "failure" but i don't > > remember anyone calling it a worldclass masterpiece either. > > > > - > > Jahanzeb > > Yup. > > I think it also puts on a question mark on the credibility of this group > itself that several members acted like mouthpieces and kept on praising the > song endlessly and even criticized those who were criticizing the song since > day one. Some are like going that way. > > Now, such members would say that liking or not liking a song is a personal > matter and they still like it. Well, it is, still there is a thing called > objectivity. When we agree that this group is considered a place to get > authentic information on ARR, and some members can't even tolerate a lovely > prank played by Gopal Anandan for that exact point, then we can't hide from > the fact that other people might be looking at this group to get authentic > feedback on the "goodness" of his songs, and all those got misguided by this > group's endless advertising Chiggy Wiggy and entire bullu. > > The reason might be: We fans might like anything given by our man because we > love our man. It is normal human psychology. We might have convinced > ourselves that we are liking Chiggy Wiggy or blue on some strengths it has > while ignoring some down points it is having. > > I hope members will learn from this and will try to be more objective in > giving their future reviews/ feedbacks on future releases of ARR. > > Remember, wrong feebacks in this group must be presenting a wrong picture > about a song/ album to ARR himself if he is accessing the group. ARR needs > truth. Underved praising will harm ARR. Let's not only utter Satyamev Jayate, > but also practice it. > > > --- In [email protected], kishore parayath <kishore.parayath@> > > wrote: > >> > >> This is the FIRST TIME that some OFFICIAL reviewer is calling an ARR track > >> as "SECOND RATE" or cheap! > > Yup, it makes me sad. > > >> So, we must ADMIT facts! Chiggy Wiggy was > >> certainly a MISTAKE from our BOSS's part, who is reverred in Bollywood and > >> accross India for having created Superhuman Divine Musical wonders! > > Yes, we must admit that. And I really wonder why ARR remained so > uncharacteristically unimaginative in this particular song. To put things in > proper perspective, I think I find Chiggy Wiggy the only single track by ARR, > out of his 800-1000 songs, that is umimaginative. May be, ARR might wish to > share "the composing of Chiggy Wiggy" or something like that to tell us what > went wrong in it. > > >> I still REMEMBER, how some fellow fans reacted when I said CHIGGY WIGGY was > >> disappointing after the FIRST promo. They called it a worldclass > >> masterpiece > >> creation, and snubbed the fans who called it average, and expected in > >> further albums. > >> > >> BOSS wont repeat mistakes. Vinnai Thaandi Varuvaaya promo makes all of us > >> speechless!! Exceptional!! > > Righto. Exactly. Boss' brand value remains high as ever. Chiggy Wiggy might > be a first failure of him so we are facing a new situation really and we are > not able to think how to accept this fact. But our trust in our man, that he > had so laboriously and consistently built up through 18 years remains as high > as always and we will devour each of his next releases. > > -- > Rawat >
