i enjoyed the review.. it was like Tareq and Michaele Salahi commenting on food in whitehouse party...
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 7:57 PM, satish_srini <[email protected]>wrote: > > > I am with Suresh on this matter. Since you run a popular website > criticizing filmmakers and composers for being unethical, it is expected > that you practice what you preach. Correct me if I am wrong, but I am sure > that you do not buy all the albums that you review in your blog, especially > the ones that you dismiss casually by the words NSFW. In such a case, do you > think that it is ethical to review something that you do not own? > > Satish > > Note: My comments have nothing to do with your review of VTV and this is > something that was in my mind for a long time. This is the price that you > have to pay for being popular!!! > > > --- In [email protected] <arrahmanfans%40yahoogroups.com>, > "inetk" <6tim...@...> wrote: > > > > Thanks Suresh, for those completely unwarranted kind words. > > > > Downloading illegal music - bad. Purchasing CDs - good. Download is done > as a matter of ease of distribution/ availability. Purchasing CD once it > releases - done as a matter of policy. > > > > I'm touched by your concern, but. Nice way of going personal over a > review. > > > > Karthik > > > > --- In [email protected] <arrahmanfans%40yahoogroups.com>, > "sureshmechnit" <sureshmechnit@> wrote: > > > > > > If you are a regular reader of that site, you must have known by this > time that he has always reviewed the albums after listening tocheap quality > illegally downloaded songs - once. All the preaching gyaans about > "anti-Plagiarism, being ethical and legal" are only for others. > > > > > > > It has become such a normal thing, that it is okay to comment on a > public platform about something that you don't even own yet. > > > > >
