That's a good reply Rawat, but I'm afraid you quoted the wrong person. It was 
Aneesh who criticized on "Aromale", not RaijenB. 



From: V S Rawat <vsra...@gmail. com>
To: arrahmanfans@ yahoogroups. com
Sent: Tue, January 12, 2010 12:20:28 PM
Subject: Re: [arr] Re: how to make a gud song to an irritating one.









 



    
      
      
      On 1/12/2010 11:01 AM India Time, _RaijenB_ wrote:



> --- In arrahmanfans@ yahoogroups. com, aneesh ani <mohdaneeshkp@ ...> wrote:

>  > Just give ur ears to aromale.it&# 39;s second n 3rd stanza&#39;s are 

> superb,but repetitive roaring of aromale is irritating.this way a gud 

> song can be changed to an irritating one.



I haven't heard VTV yet, but I am always happy to hear when someone 

criticizes an ARR song on his first few hearings.



Such criticism tells me that ARR has tried something new that our ears 

had never heard so far and thus we are not attuned to hear and 

internalize it in first few hearings.



And it has been proved times and again in last 18 years, that such 

songs which got criticized on the first few hearings got most beloved 

and most popular because our slow minds take time to understand what a 

genius called ARR has done and then we internalize it and appreciate 

it and keep on liking the same for ever.



And it surprises me that some diehard fan of ARR will surely come up 

criticizing some song within a few hours of its release, forgetting 

his experience on 1000+ songs when he criticized something first and 

started liking it later on. This time it is RaijenB!



Let's wait for the song to grow on raijen.



> pls use old singers like 

> sreenivas etc. pls dnt use blazee&#39;s rap in every album it looks similar.



Are you sure it is Blaze that sounds same, or could be the very 

essence of Rap genre of music itself that it sounds always same?



If every MD keeps on using old established singers, no new singer 

would get his first song.



--

Rawat



    
     









      

    
     

    
    


 



  






      

Reply via email to