Same here, these comments seems very weird as to me too Raavan music is completely original, no deja vu feelings, no resemblances. perhaps this guy is talking about contents/theme only and not music/composition, but still cannot agree.
/Jahanzeb --- In [email protected], "AJ" <purev...@...> wrote: > > Here's a comment I found on the net about Raavan's music: > > "Guys, without getting into the argument of whether this is one of ARR's best > and whether it would receive the same acclaim if it wasn't an ARR score > didn't anyone else feel deja vu when listening to this album every song I > felt like `This one's like Kala Bandar', this one's like `Barso Re', this > one's like `Rukmini' (in content, not in form) of course ARR has a distinct > sound and so some of it is to be expected but still, its getting a bit > repetitive, me thinks" > > I completely don't know where this guy is coming from. Huh? To me, the > music of Raavan is completely original and fresh, sounding nothing (content > wise) like his previous works. Yes, his strong signatures are there and > certain raagas have been used before as always, but does anyone else feel > "deja vu" when listening to Raavan? None of the melodies in Raavan bear > resemblance to previous ARR songs and the song architecture and sound in each > track is very unique and distinct......something very new and fresh. It > does not sound repetitive at all to me.....WHATSOEVER!!! >
