Interesting. What too me by surprise though was his reference to Dil Se Re
as an "unstaisfying number"
*Its opening fifty seconds are reminiscent in tone of Anwar's "Symphony in
Blue", but "Behne Do" then veers back into a more traditional direction
(this track is about transporting love; not the victim of society at Anwar's
core), combining a conventional tune-structure with the mood of "Dil Se Re"
(Dil Se). Over a decade on from that unsatisfying number, though, Rahman is
now more adept at composing testimonials to hopelessly overwrought desi love
in a semi-Western orchestral setting.
*
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Gopal Srinivasan <[email protected]>wrote:

>
>
> http://qalandari.blogspot.com/2010/04/music-review-raavan-hindi-2010.html
>  Music Review: RAAVAN (Hindi; 
> 2010)<http://qalandari.blogspot.com/2010/04/music-review-raavan-hindi-2010.html>
>
> <http://www.abhishekbachchan.org/gallery/albums/movies/ravana/stills/raavanstills0028.jpg>
>
>
> The music of "Raavan" -- supposedly a modern day re-telling of The Ramayana
> -- wasn't what I was expecting. Instead of a self-contained album confining
> itself to the world of the film like several other collaborations between
> composer A.R. Rahman and director Mani Rathnam (such as "Alai Payuthey",
> "Yuva", or "Kannathil Muthamittal"), this album hearkens to the music of the
> greatest Rathnam film of all, "Iruvar", in its anthologizing of almost an
> entire film music tradition. But whereas Rehman's mode in "Iruvar" was
> history, with each song representing a different Tamil film era (Rehman's
> genius ensuring that none of the songs seemed derivative or stale, as merely
> nostalgic numbers would have), the "Raavan" album cannot imagine such
> continuity: the Hindi film musical tradition is here, but in shards as it
> were. The cumulative effect of the album is thus somewhat disorienting, as
> musical moments from Bollywood's past -- a 1990s song here, a Punjabi beat
> there, a tapori jig elsewhere, even strains reminiscent of some who have
> followed in Rahman's wake, such as Mithoon -- occur when least expected.
> Fitting: for nothing so linear as chronology (even where history is
> refracted through Rathnam's eye) makes sense in the realm of myth (and the
> power of myth), even if, in the case of Rathnam's Ramayana, by virtue of
> being a contemporary tale, the myth is itself is heir to several
> histories...
>
> The first song on the CD, "Beera", would have been more at home in "Yuva"
> than at least one song in that Rahman/Rathnam/Abhishek Bachchan film (think
> of "Kabhi Neem Neem"): the soaring, clean instrumentation, the in-your-face
> lyrics, the urban vibe (that is to say, not music targeted at the
> self-consciously urbane, but music that takes its bustle and restlessness
> from cities) that was practically invented in Hindi and Tamil cinema by
> Rahman -- "Beera" shows that six years on, the Master still has it, and he
> doesn't need to repeat himself to show it. Gulzar's lyrics owe more than a
> few debts to his earlier work on the title song of "Omkara", but musically
> the two are as different as can be; and if the lyrics of "Beera" are nowhere
> near the equals of those in the earlier song in terms of epic grandeur and
> the sort of myth-making this sort of "hero" song cries out for (although
> Gulzar shrewdly uses the word "Beera" ("brave"; or "warrior") as a refrain
> for entire lines of song, almost seeking to obviate the need for any other
> poetry), musically the solid and assured "Omkara" cannot match "Beera" in
> fleetness of foot or deft touch. And if this emphasis on charm seems a bit
> incongruous in a film named after Hinduism's most famous villain (or, from
> the perspective of Dravidian nationalists, its most vilified hero), perhaps
> it tells us something about the film: virtually all of the album's
> quintessential "hero" songs are lighter, more upbeat, than its dark, fretful
> love songs. A quibble: at just a shade over three minutes, I wish it were
> longer -- Keerthi Prakash, Vijay Prakash, Mustafa, and Rahman's vocals
> didn't begin to satisfy me, giving this song the air of a tease.
>
> Its opening fifty seconds are reminiscent in tone of Anwar's "Symphony in
> Blue", but "Behne Do" then veers back into a more traditional direction
> (this track is about transporting love; not the victim of society at Anwar's
> core), combining a conventional tune-structure with the mood of "Dil Se Re"
> (Dil Se). Over a decade on from that unsatisfying number, though, Rahman is
> now more adept at composing testimonials to hopelessly overwrought desi love
> in a semi-Western orchestral setting. Think of it as the frontier between
> "Dil Se Re" and "Satrangi" from the same film (certainly singers Mohammad
> Irfan and Karthik seem to think so, with their Sonu Nigam-inspired vocals)
> -- while I doubt "Behne Do" will ever rise to the level of the best neo-Sufi
> love song in Bollywood history, Rahman's integration of the Western
> orchestration into a completely Indian emotional landscape bodes well (in
> the past, his attempts along these lines have more often than not been
> unsuccessful). Ultimately, though, the song, splendid in itself (except for
> the fact that not for the first or last time in the album, Rahman relegates
> his own vocals to the background), suffers from the presence of "Ranjha
> Ranjha" in the same album, almost as if two different attempts at fulfilling
> director Mani Rathnam's brief have been preserved in the same album. "Behne
> De" isn't completely subsumed by the later song's spell, but what is its own
> is poorer.
>
> With respect to "Thok de Kili" a real pity that the album's most
> politically daring lyrics -- turning on childish rhymes between nails
> (killi), a common Indian street game (gilli), and of course, the national
> capital (in lines reminiscent of the 1857 battle-cry "Delhi chalo!", itself
> appropriated decades later by Subhash Chandra Bose for his rebel Indian
> National Army) -- should be housed in the least impressive musical number.
> Its certainly early days for me and this song yet, and it is perhaps the
> most inaccessible (and deceptively so) of the album's songs. But while the
> instrumental portions have a chocolate velocity to them that is hard to
> resist, the vocal portions (by Am'nico, Sukhvinder Singh, and Rahman
> himself, although one is hard-pressed to make out anyone but Singh) drone on
> without getting anywhere. Gulzar's daring appropriation of the rebel trope
> for some of contemporary India's least popular political militants
> (Abhishek's "Raavan" character has long been rumored to have Naxalite
> antecedents; the stinging criticisms of Delhi's neglect, and references to
> the color red, appear to provide confirmation), deserved better. I'm curious
> to see if the Tamil version will showcase this song's music to greater
> advantage.
>
> The folly inherent in predicting which number in a Rahman album is going to
> stand the test of time in my iPod playlists is not going to prevent me from
> nominating "*Ranjha Ranjha*" as my favorite song from this album. Rekha
> Bharadwaj's chorus-refrain is addictively catchy, but insistently and
> urgently so, and no less mournful for it -- a worthy metonym for a song that
> re-treads old ground about love being both blessing and curse, loss of
> identity and derangement, slave and master, and -- not coincidentally given
> Raavan's theme -- kidnapper and captive. Thanks to Gulzar, who is at his
> best where, as here, he borrows bits of folk songs and poetry to use as a
> springboard, the lyrics are that rarest of things in Hindi romantic numbers:
> fresh. The song's urgency -- devoid of aggression -- is crucial in rescuing
> the song from the merely conventional, far removed from the strains (too
> familiar to place with precision, in too unfamiliar a setting to be placed),
> left over from other songs, other musical moments wafting in and out of this
> seductive yet unsettled number. Who knew that a khichdi everything from
> Nadeem-Shravan's mediocrity (often by means of Javed Ali's callow-sounding
> voice); Sufi-kitsch the Bhatts specialize in; the generic urban sound of
> countless "male bonding" songs; held together by the promise of intimacy
> always suggested by Rekha Bharadwaj's voice; could combine to yield an
> ambience so compelling?
>
> I'm not a huge fan of Rahman's very slow Hindi numbers, but "Khili Re" is
> the way Goldilocks would have liked it: just right. Rahman gets it right,
> first, by using a female solo (most of his slow misfires are male solos,
> such as Bombay's "Tu Hi Re" (Hindi)/ "Uyire" (Tamil); and second, by keeping
> things simple for the first minute and a half with restrained
> instrumentation accompanying Reena Bhardwaj's delicate voice. Just when you
> begin to think the song might have trouble sustaining interest over five
> minutes, tabla beats (of a decidedly traditional dance bent) break into the
> song, inflecting this song with a structure and balance it might not
> otherwise have had, even after it has returned to Bharadwaj's vocals. Over
> all, the purity of this song is reminiscent of some of Rahman's earliest
> works (such as "Dil Hai Chota Sa" from "Roja"; or "Karuthamma"), and while
> it is too polished to completely blend in with that company, it is
> heartening to encounter Rahman's continued readiness to compose work in a
> decidedly minor vein, especially nowadays, when the combination of the Oscar
> for "Slumdog Millionaire" and the fact that (unlike in Tamil, as even the
> far-from-great Vinaithaandi Varuvaaya will attest), he makes music in
> Hindi mostly for Big Films, threatens the mellower pleasures his music
> affords.
>
> "Kata Kata Bechaara Bakra" has to be the most rambunctious, fun, Rahman
> number in quite some time, a wedding-song that reminds the audience there
> was one (far more lewd) in the album that brought Rahman India-wide renown
> ("Rukmini Rukmi" from Roja). Despite all the throwback fun -- the backup
> vocals, the percussion, and the speed all might have been transposed from
> the era when Rahman unleased *Kathalan *on us, while the lyrics are clear
> kin to those in "September Maatham" (Alai Payuthey)/ "Chori pe Chori"
> (Saathiya) -- this song is not fluff. In any film that purports to engage
> with the Ramayana, the question of marriage has to loom large; and while I
> don't know if this song is set at the wedding of the purported Ram and
> Sita-characters, the conch shell-sounds that punctuate this track never
> allowed me to forget that this film is supposed to re-imagine an epic, that
> something cosmic is in the air. That extra dimension, unncessary in the
> analogous songs from Roja or Alai Payuthey, is also expressed in Ila Arun's
> vocals, which take this song into a more traditional (and surprising) place,
> the North Indian "household" women's songs that are now virtually extinct in
> urban India (but not, apparently, for Rahman, whose "Genda Phool" (Delhi-6)
> is also in this vein). In a little over five minutes, distinct Indian spaces
> -- the urban South, the North, and the western deserts it is impossible not
> to think of when confronted with Arun's voice -- bubble up and vanish. This
> song (like its mythical progenitor) has geography on its mind. [My one
> reservation: while my non-existent grasp of Tamil will mean that I'll miss
> Gulzar's lyrics in the Tamil version, I can't help feeling that language's
> more definite consonants and springy rhythm will do greater justice to the
> mood of this number than Gulzar's playful lyrics; I mean, could "Kummi
> Aaadi" (Sillunu Oru Kaadal) have been nearly as much fun in any other
> language?]
>
> 
>

Reply via email to