Hello Taimur :)

1st of all you're excusing all Rahmaniacs for "your" criticism on Raavan
music.... again you're asking apology to those Rahmaniacs who felt bad about
"your" frequent down ratings of Raavan.

I can really understand your conditions here and got traumatized looking at
your sense and sensibilities... I think ironically you have a dual state of
mind based on which you listen to music and compose emails... and others got
confused...

Pls excuse me or I ask you apology if you feel bad (however I'll not dare to
excuse you if I say something BAD)...

Arijit

On 14/05/2010, Taimur Nadeem <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>   Dear RAHMANIACS, just cool wool down and i excuse all of you for my
> frequent criticism on Raavan music, this time i didnt started the thread i
> was just giving answer to indmovbuff question.but i apologize to anyone who
> felt bad about my frequent down ratings of RAAVAN. And i really welcome the
> criticism you do on me , it shows your love for the fellow Rahmaniac. my
> intentions are always positive and whatever i say is due to my love for A R
> RAHMANs music.
>
> tell you a positive thing about Raavan music , kata kata is just ruling my
> music listening these days, mighty precussion, superb voices, breath taking
> finale and jaye na joru bin (male chorus) , joru abhi kamsin(female
> chorus) , kanya ko bulao (wierd male chorus) just loved this part its the
> best.
>
> For the main thing is we love A R RAHMAN , we love his music, the bonding
> between us is A R RAHMAN .
>
> and i am also getting these duplicate emails , now have a good day  , keep
> listening A R RAHMAN and RAAVAN for sure.
>
> regards,
>
> taimur
> --- On *Thu, 5/13/10, Indmov Buff <[email protected]>* wrote:
>
>
>
> From: Indmov Buff <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [arr] Khili re... an Ultimate melody...
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Thursday, May 13, 2010, 5:31 AM
>
>
>  Me- too. Duplicate e-mails for sometime now. Yahoo bug?
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* || V i s h w e s h || <vishws...@yahoo. com>
> *To:* arrahmanfans@ yahoogroups. com
> *Sent:* Wed, 12 May, 2010 20:48:57
> *Subject:* Re: [arr] Khili re... an Ultimate melody...
>
>
> Is is only me or everyone else too receiving many of the mails twice?? Is
> their some problem with yahoo?? " The search is more important than the
> destination " - a r rahman - ____________ _________ _________ __ From:
> A.R.Rajib To: arrahmanfans@ yahoogroups. com Cc: vishws...@yahoo. com
> Sent: Wed, 12 May, 2010 9:33:23 PM Subject: Re: [arr] Khili re... an
> Ultimate melody... U will always be talking to a wall .. So stop talking ...
> This reminds of Tom hanks in Cast Away ... He talks to a Basketball for 5
> Years when he was isolated in an Unknown island alone !!! Some people never
> Changes !! I wont be surprised if they claim that they r the jury members of
> Oscars Tamil Version !! ( Bappi lahiri Version 2 ) On Wed, May 12, 2010 at
> 8:36 PM, || V i s h w e s h || wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >It's
> like talking to a wall. OK dude... we get it... so pls stop repeating it in
> your every mail move on (or move back) to the another AR album which you
> enjoy and leave us mere mortals alone to experience the (extra) ordinary
> Raavan! > > >" The search is more important than the destination " >- a r
> rahman - > > > > >> ____________ _________ _________ __ From: Taimur Nadeem
> >To: arrahmanfans@ yahoogroups. com >Sent: Tue, 11 May, 2010 10:59:09 AM >
> >Subject: Re: [arr] Khili re... an Ultimate melody... > > > > > > >> > >Dear
> Rahmaniacs, > i am listening to ravan album for more than two weeks now and
> i have come out with a clear cut opinion that the songs could have been far
> far better than what they are right now. the concepts are amazing, the
> lyrics good as well, but the tunes and whole song are ordinary, nothing
> great or masterpiece stuff . i have never compared A R RAHMAN previous works
> with the current, my say is that the concepts that MANI RATNAM came up in
> Raavan are really different , but the songs are just not there they could
> have been made better. thats what i think. > >regards, > >taimur .
>
>
>
>
> 
>

Reply via email to