"RDB got crtical and commercial acclaim with 2 oscar nominations as well."

Is it true?? I heard 2 songs were selected in last 63 songs in the Academy
Awards....

Arijit

On 31 August 2010 06:36, raj <arr_naga...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
>
> Exactly Thulasi..
> I still remember how many people said RDB is bad/horrible bla bla..
>
> Somebody said 'Kalyug and few other albums are much much better than RDB'.
> One more I could recall was 'Luka chuppi is the only saving grace'. Some
> radio channel gave RDB a ranking of 17 on a top 20 list.
>
> All these happened before movie release. After movie release, the songs
> were a rage and RDB got crtical and commercial acclaim with 2 oscar
> nominations as well.
>
>
> --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com <arrahmanfans%40yahoogroups.com>,
> Thulasi Ram <karoke...@...> wrote:
> >
> > it will always happen buddy.. RDB sucks. after delhi 6 release, media
> said
> > delhi 6 is doesnt compare to the class and beauty of RDB! btw, delhi 6 is
> a
> > runaway musical hit!! i can a dozen more recent instances like that.
> recent
> > one being sivaji and enthiran. similar analogy applies.
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 2:36 AM, Ram Motipally <mramvina...@...>wrote:
>
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > thank god he is not a cricketer, otherwise some people would call for
> him
> > > to retire !
> > >
> > > Fascinating how when AR won the oscar, some people said Jai Ho is not
> his
> > > best. Now some people are saying the CWG song does not have the beauty
> of a
> > > Jai Ho !
> > >
> > > ------------------------------
> > > *From:* Farzad Khaleel <farsad...@...>
> > > *To:* arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com <arrahmanfans%40yahoogroups.com>
>
> > > *Sent:* Sun, August 29, 2010 5:03:20 PM
> > > *Subject:* Re: [arr] leave ARR
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Moderator would surely allow you. Keep posting at the time of new
> releases.
> > > Would be handy ;)
> > >
> > > On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Mohan Devanand <sharab...@...>wrote:
>
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> PLEASE for GOD'S sake try to avoid immature,unfair criticism on ARR'S
> > >> mostly brilliant repertoire till now. To keep on posting only to start
> a
> > >> debate or just to seek a few peoples attention ,has become a habit
> with some
> > >> so called music lovers.You are entitled to your opinion, you have all
> the
> > >> right to express it but ,people who are sane and occupied with some
> useful
> > >> work may not have all the time to indulge in such absurd debates.
> > >>
> > >> Somebody trying to degrade a splendid musical masterpiece [what ever
> it
> > >> is]
> > >> approved and celebrated by the majority including many noted critics
> all
> > >> over the world,only expose themselves as a sick clown. ARR is not a
> GOD,nor
> > >> a complete authority in music to turn every attempt of his into
> > >> gold.Nevertheless ,he has proved time and again as an absolute genius
> . His
> > >> work is unarguably a league apart,eminently superior than his
> counterparts
> > >> as well as his predecessors.The biggest problem with us is,we tend to
> pull
> > >> down a person who is successful beyond a certain extent ,for no
> reason.If we
> > >> were to name a few extremely talented persons who have extensive
> > >> international recognition,in all categories,ARR will be in the fore
> > >> front.Moreover that list is absolutely short as you can find only a
> very few
> > >> in this country.Indians who have achieved tremendously by innovating,
> > >> recognized by highest forums like NOBEL committee, have been NRI's
> > >> mostly.This country has little place for real achievers, be it sports
> or
> > >> science.A SACHIN or ARR happen very rarely. If you are not satisfied
> with
> > >> people like them,fine ,you should be a genius ,so kindly spare them
> and
> > >> allow them to stay here and bring more laurels to this country. Please
> let
> > >> us not allow ARR to do a PANDIT RAVISHANKER. thank you
> > >> your's respectfully
> > >> AN INDIAN FAN
> > >> PS; hope the moderator allows this .
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Farzad Khaleel
> > > www.rahmaniac.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>  
>

Reply via email to