Thats precisely what I am saying. A better choice of word by Ar wouldnt have given media a chance to misinterpret.
--- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, Gayathri Chandrakasan <gayathri_c...@...> wrote: > > Actually, "going beyond" doesn't necessarily mean to surpass something. It > can also mean to be different or away from something. In that light, probably > ARR would have meant that CWG theme would be something different than Waka > Waka rather than what was interpreted by the media. > > --- On Wed, 9/1/10, raj <arr_naga...@...> wrote: > > From: raj <arr_naga...@...> > Subject: [arr] Re: Will the CWG song be re-done now? > To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com > Date: Wednesday, September 1, 2010, 6:43 PM > > > > > > > > Â > > > > > > > > > > He said we would do something beyond Waka Waka. I think he meant > something different but his choice of word can be easily interpreted as > surpass. I was surprised by his response initially. But having seen and heard > almost every AR interview in the last 10 -12 years, i just ignored it as > inappropriate choice of word. > > > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, "Niven" <nivensrn@> wrote: > > > > > > "which he had famously claimed his tune would surpass"??? > > > > > > Did Rahman mention this? I am very doubtful!!! > > > > > > Niven > > > > > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, Aakarsh <aakarsh_vk@> wrote: > > > > > > > > http://movies.indiatimes.com/News-Gossip/News/AR-Rahmans-theme-track-for-CWG-rejected/articleshow/6472955.cms > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > Aakarsh > > > > Â > > > > Â > > > > > > > >
