I say settle it in the octagon!!! Lets get it on!!!
>Andy L. Mayfield
>System Operation Specialist
>Alabama Power Company
Office: 8-226-1805
-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Will Du Chene
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 5:21 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: OT: Release of ARS 7.0 Info
I'll probably get flogged for this both on the list and off, but...
Whether or not someone is a 'solid' contributor or not is irrelevant.
Whether or not it is a joke or not is irrelevant. Everyone here on the
list is - allegedly - the same. On a basic level, we are each a person,
and deserve to be treated with an equal measure of respect -
professional
and otherwise.
I do not support your post. It was pretty hard on the guy and appears to
be more or less a statement of your opinion - nothing more. Messages
like
that shouldn't have a place here. If you disagree with someone strongly,
you are free to send it offline.
> He is solid contributor, and I too have learned from them. I
appreciate
> his
> technical insights and I give him kudos in that area.
> No "we all" don't know he was joking. His reply to the list was
"Option
> A",
> so it wasn't a joke.
>
> Tim
>
> _____
>
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Palmer
> Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 1:35 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Release of ARS 7.0 Info
>
>
> **
> Wow, pretty hard on James. We all knew he was joking!
>
> Besides, he's a good, solid contributor and I've learned from his
posts!
>
> Susan
>
>
> On 4/23/06, Timothy Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No Rick, that's not what I meant. If BMC is talking about something,
then
> so
> can we.
>
> What I meant was....the article isn't actually about the ARS product.
> That's
>
> why it's a "feeble attempt at Friday humor"....
>
> What I meant was:
>
> A) If James didn't read the web article that the URL took him to, then
he
> should have. If he did, he would have realized that it's actually not
> about
> Remedy (sorry to ruin it Steve), and thus the entire blurb about the
NDA
> is
> not needed. Stephen doesn't need to be chastised about how "bad" he is
> about
> releasing info when in actuality, he wasn't releasing anything at all.
>
> B) If James did read the web article that the URL sent him to, then
the
> blurb about the NDA is even more uncalled for since it was completely
> irrelevant. It would then be just another instance of James trying to
> either:
> 1) Demonstrate how much he knows and make sure that we all
realize
> it.
> OR
> 2) Moderate/control the rest of us, because you know...we can't
> really can't make those decisions for ourselves.
>
> Which one was it? A, B1 or B2?
>
> Tim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Cook
> Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2006 2:33 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Release of ARS 7.0 Info
>
> Indeed - you mean you can't talk about something even if BMC is? I
don't
> think so, Tim.
>
> Rick
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) on behalf of
Timothy
> Powell
> Sent: Sun 4/23/2006 6:21 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Release of ARS 7.0 Info
>
>
>
>
> **
> James,
>
> Maybe you should look at the web article first......
>
> Tim
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of McKenzie, James J C-E LCMC
> HQISEC/L3
> Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2006 6:31 PM
> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: OT: Release of ARS 7.0 Info
>
>
> **
>
> Dan:
>
> Wow! What a punishment....
>
> Actually, the release of ANY information on ARS 7.0, except by BMC, is
a
> violation of the NDA that testers are required to sign.
>
> James
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: 4/21/2006 2:12 PM
> Subject: Re: ARS 7.0 Info
>
> **
> Quite.
> Due to the lameness, and not including the OT: prefix in the subject
> line,
> you can't post any more attempts for 6 months, and you must read every
> one that Gidd posts.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Heider, Stephen
> Sent: April 21, 2006 16:00
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: ARS 7.0 Info
>
>
> **
> I finally found some info on ARS 7.0, code name Iron Horse.
>
> http://www.dirtragmag.com/print/article.php?ID=408
> <http://www.dirtragmag.com/print/article.php?ID=408>
> <http://www.dirtragmag.com/print/article.php?ID=408
>
<http://www.dirtragmag.com/print/article.php?ID=408&category=stuff_revie
>
> &category=stuff_revie
> ws> &category=stuff_reviews
>
> Stephen
>
> *feeble attempt at Friday humor ;)
> __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML
in
> it___
>
> __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML
in
> it___
>
> __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML
in
> it___
> __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML
in
> it___
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
____
>
> ___
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at http://www.wwrug.org
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
____
> ___
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at http://www.wwrug.org
>
>
>
> __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML
in
> it___
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
_______
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at http://www.wwrug.org
>
________________________________________________________________________
_______
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at http://www.wwrug.org
_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at http://www.wwrug.org
