In the past I have spent many hours editing the definitions in a .def file, by 
the end of a 5 hour session trying to get a def file right I was a nervous 
wreck.  It is much easier in a .xml file.  It can still be difficult to get 
everything quite right, but if you have a large number of fields mapped, it is 
worth taking the time to understand the structure and how to edit it.

Sam

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Jarl Grøneng
Sent: Wednesday, 3 May 2006 18:39
To: ARSList
Subject: Re: WSDL's two questions

Yes. It is a pain when you wnt to add new elements to the WSDL.
However I has several times exported the filter in xml deffile, edit
the xml-file, and then import the def-file. It can be time saving, but
you got to know what your doing, and know the structure of the wsdl!

I also edit the xml def-file manually when I has to change the url.

--
Jarl

On 5/2/06, Ilmer, Mike (GTI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> **
> Hello List,
>
> Does anyone have any recommendation on mapping procedure of the new fields
> for the (outbound) WSDL interface.
>
> It seems like every time when we need  to add a new field to the client's
> (external) WSDL where remedy needs to push data to, I can see new fields
> only after clicking the "Load" button. But, clicking this button causing
> losing existing mapping. Any recommendations?
>
>
> Also, any recommendation on migrating the WSDL related workflow form dev to
> qa to production? The WSDL's url is hard coded and I have two option. One:
> to keep the separate workflow for each server. The other option is to modify
> url before or after each migration. Both options doesn't look really
> convenient. Any thoughts?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
> ________________________________
>
> If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the
> sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain
> or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to
> this e-mail.     http://www.ml.com/email_terms/
> ________________________________
> __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted
> with HTML in it___

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at http://www.wwrug.org

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at http://www.wwrug.org

Reply via email to