Re: Optimization question

[Sam Ferguson]

** There are other benefits of having one active link instead of two: - Less active links to list in the admin tool.  We have all seen how long this takes if you have a large system. - When the form definition changes and the user tool needs to download another version of the .arf and .arv files, these will be smaller. - Through mid-tier the size of the files transferred to the end user will be smaller.   The above will have a very small impact on the system, but your question is based on a very minute performance difference anyway J   Sam   From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of L. J. Head Sent: Thursday, 4 May 2006 2:19 To: ARSList Subject: Re: Optimization question   I would suspect that the single al would be faster due to the fact that it doesn't need to evaluate the run-if qualification more than once...but you are likely talking about fractions of seconds faster   From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shafqat Ayaz Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 2:48 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Optimization question ** Hi List a question on optimization, will 1 Active Link with 15 actions ( for example just Change Fields only ) run faster than split into 2 consecutive Active Links with 8 actions and 7 actions? I have not actually been able to time it, but my guess would be the first option, any ideas? kind regards shafqat Shafqat Ayaz Love cheap thrills? Enjoy PC-to-Phone calls to 30+ countries for just 2¢/min with Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in it___ __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in it___ __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in it___