From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of McKenzie, James J C-E LCMC HQISEC/L3
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 4:38 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Solaris 10 and Oracle 9i
Chris:
I will state that Oracle says the memory 'footprint' for 10g is larger than 9i. If you are running on a marginal machine for 9i it will unusable for 10g. I presently run Oracle 9i on 1GB of physical memory. 10g will not run on this machine. And yes, I asked for 4GB of memory which I consider the minimum to run 10g.
James McKenzie
-----Original Message-----
From: Action
Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Axton Grams
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 2:27 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re:
Solaris 10 and Oracle 9i
We are running 10g on Solaris 9. Only thing I can add is that 7.0 requires the 10g client.
Axton Grams
Christopher Pruitt wrote:
> Hello
Fellow Listers,
>
> I
would hear from any of you that has any experience with running
> Oracle 9i on Solaris 10. We are considering upgrading our servers to
> Solaris 10 and continue to run our Oracle 9i
database but need to know
> if there are any issues,
pitfall, show stoppers, or any other bugs, as
> well
as successful implementations of this configuration.
>
> Any feedback would be
appreciated.
>
>
Christopher Pruitt
> Consultant Specialist
> EDS - Bank of America
> I3
Production Support Team
> Phone: +1-972-605-7702
(8-835)
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
______________________________________________________________________
> _________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at
> http://www.wwrug.org
>
_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at http://www.wwrug.org
