Yup - checking workflow references before deleting fields is a must. What are you guys using for a cross-reference resource? We ran MARS, which was turned into RDP, which couldn't be trusted, among other weaknesses. By the way, is RDP ready for prime time yet?
Mike White
Office: 813-978-2192
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Carey Matthew
Black" To: [email protected]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:
COM> Subject: Re: Question: Active
Link
Sent by: "Action
Request System
discussion
list(ARSList)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ORG>
07/17/2006 11:06
Please respond to
arslist
T,
I would hope that this condition is not a performance issue. If it is
then think about what shared workflow must be like for performance.
Every Active Link running on multiple forms is likely to stumble on to
this condition. (Unless all of your forms have the same set of fields
that are only used by your shared workflow.)
If you check the client Active Link logs You will actually see that
the "field" is set but there is a note that it does not exist on the
current form. Then the processing just keeps going. So I doubt it is a
real problem.
However, James comment about reusing fieldID's are also excellent
points on the topic.
--
Carey Matthew Black
Remedy Skilled Professional (RSP)
ARS = Action Request System(Remedy)
Solution = People + Process + Tools
Fast, Accurate, Cheap.... Pick two.
Never ascribe to malice, that which can be explained by incompetence.
On 7/17/06, T. Dee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have some active links that I have found and when I open them it says:
>
> One/more fields have been deleted from the Form which will affect
Setfield
> list. Please press Modify Action button to rectify the problem (ARWARN
> 2546).
>
> Does this affect performance at all?
>
> Thanks.
_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at http://www.wwrug.org
_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at http://www.wwrug.org
