On Tue, 1 Aug 2006 21:11:37 +0100, David Sanders 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
>Scenario 1 - MT Servers local to ARS, they would be on same LAN as the ARS
>server and firewall(s) would be between the end-users browsers and this.
>
>ARS---FW---MT --------------pipe--------------- FW------Users
>
>
>
>Scenario 2 - MT Servers local to Users.
>
>ARS----FW ---------------pipe---------------- MT---FW---Users
>
>
We have tested both scenarios with a MT in South-Asia-Pacific (SAP), Europe 
(EU), and the U.S. against ARS Server in US (all separate machines)

SAP to US is a 4.5MB pipe
EU to US 45MB (yes, much bigger pipe)
I will highlight SAP users to US results as EU users to US were comparable 
to US users

ARS----FW ---------------pipe---------------- MT---FW--- SAP Browser Users

Time to cache MT performed 2% worse, and time to load already cached 
forms/data performed equally to:

ARS---FW---MT --------------pipe--------------- FW------SAP Browser Users

>>>>>>>>>

ARS---FW---MT --------------pipe--------------- FW------US Browser Users

Time to cache MT performed 22% better, and time to load cached forms/data 
in browser performed 35% better than:

ARS---FW---MT --------------pipe--------------- FW------SAP Browser Users

>>>>>>>>>

ARS--------pipe---------------SAP User Tool Users

Time to cache locally performed 73% better, and time to load cached 
forms/Data performed 25% better than:

ARS---FW---MT --------------pipe--------------- FW------SAP Browser Users

**An interesting note: US based Browser users (already cached) sometimes 
outperformed US based UT users by 14% although the UT was more consistent.

>>>>>>>>>

Conclusion,
Bandwidth and latency matter most of all.  The EU performed equally with 
the US.

Ultimately, We went with two load balanced (SLB) MT's in the same US 
datacenter as the ARS servers.  The redundancy of the SLB MT turned out to 
be much more of a necessity for availability sake.  Performance is mute if 
they're not on-line and the MT's distributed regionally would have been 
single points of failure for those regions.

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at http://www.wwrug.org

Reply via email to