For
platform security and stability reasons alone the concept
of the
Admin tool going away as a separate app seems a bad choice,
and
last I heard had been put on the back burner for a bit.
Some
form of multithreading, the separate read thread sounds
interesting
but
still potentially dangerous, would seem a good thing.
(and
then there is multithreading of escalations,
but
therein lies another whole set of posts and issues).
...
Daniel
__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in it___-----Original Message-----**
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of McKenzie, James J C-E LCMC HQISEC/L3
Sent: August 10, 2006 15:07
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Multiple Admin Threads - Worthwhile?Carey:
The concept you spoke of here:
>"
>Do you think the BMC engineers are up to it?
>"
> Maybe they do not want to change the Admin tool at all. Maybe they would rather stop >making an Admin Tool and push everything into the Mid-Tier?They want to push EVERYTHING to a web based application. Like I've said here before, if you know of a method to create forms through a Java interface, BMC wants you NOW!
They would like to get rid of the WUT and move all its functionality including dynamic storage of queries (otherwise called macros) to the web. This would increase the number of platforms supported and remove the requirement to support an application and its associated problems.
James McKenzie
__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in it___
