If Matt is right, the way to deal with that is with a comprehensive naming
methodology that identifies the type of object and it's run order as part of
the object name.  That will keep duplicates from being an issue.

Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carey Matthew Black
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 5:47 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Remedy integration with CVS

Ruediger,

I know nothing about the proxy your talking about, but based on what you
said I would be concerned.

If this proxy is only doing things by "object name" then you likely have
other problems to deal with too... There are multiple names spaces for ARS
objects. For example: You can have a form named "Bob", an active link also
named "Bob", a Filter named "Bob", a Menu named "Bob", and a Web Service
named "Bob". If your Source control system does not recognized that Active
Link "Bob" is an active link then the order of which these objects are added
to your Source Control system matters as the last one in will "win" and
replace the other object.
(Which might be a very subtle and bad thing if you later try to check out
the form "Bob" and get an active link definition in the process.
:(

--
Carey Matthew Black
Remedy Skilled Professional (RSP)
ARS = Action Request System(Remedy)

Love, then teach
Solution = People + Process + Tools
Fast, Accurate, Cheap.... Pick two.


On 10/9/06, Ruediger Tams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> @Tim Widowfield
>
> Hi Tim,
> I've just testetd the pushOK Proxy with ARS 6.3 Admin p17 and ARS 
> server
> 6.3 p15 but I have different issues.
> I've tested pushOK to connect to a subversion server but pushOK won't 
> create the object tree in subversion like I see it in my Admin Tool.
> I have only one module and all objects (forms, ALs, filters...) under 
> this module.
>
> I can't check in or check out my objects correctly, too.
> e.g. I've checked in a Form. Now I wanted to check out this form.
> It wasn't possible - and when I wanted to check in again it says that 
> this object wasn't checked out...
>
> What versions did you used? Thanks. :-)
>
> Regards
>  Ruediger

____________________________________________________________________________
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at http://www.wwrug.org

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at http://www.wwrug.org

Reply via email to