I'm still trying wrap my head around what they were thinking when they fundamentally changed the nature of the CDM. It was done "to improve performance", but the supporting evidence I've seen is as thin and full of holes as a 20 year old t-shirt.
Rick On May 14, 2015 9:38 AM, "Thad Esser" <[email protected]> wrote: > ** > Has anyone else taken a look at the new "Association" server object for > version 9.0? I've only read the docs (haven't played with it yet), but > this seem like a huge new feature, with possibilities way beyond just > archiving (which is what the docs say its being used for). > > https://docs.bmc.com/docs/display/public/ars9000/Associations+overview > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4v0X2SimKY > > Just curious what others thought, or if I'm nerd-ing out too much. > > Thad > _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
