I'm working through some changes for our service targets within our SLM module 
and I've started to uncover some things that are happening that I swear worked 
differently in our previous version.  We are currently on 8.1.01 and I have 
just a generic Service Target (I've switched out our internal language with 
ITSM sample data:


Applies to: Incident
Goal Type: Incident Resolution Time
Terms & Conditions: 'Contact Company' = "Calbro Services" AND 'Priority' = "Low"

Single Goal of 240hrs (we use the reported date on the INC form as the Start 
Time)

Measurement Criteria: We use the OOB Defined template of:

Start When: 'Status' >="New"
Stop When: 'Status' >= "Resolved"
Exclude: 'Status' = "Pending" AND 'Status_Reason' = 13000

Set Warning Status at 80%
Reset Goal for Same Request = No
Allow Service Target to Re-Open: Yes

In my use case, my service target as a target of 240hrs.  Let's say I resolve 
the incident within 2hrs, where my target is then met based on my criteria.  
What I have found is that if I re-open the incident let's say after 1 hr of it 
being resolved, when I re-open the incident, the SLM target is then adjusted by 
an hour.  In essence, the hour that the ticket was spent in a resolved status 
is being excluded from the measurement when it is re-opened.  I was thinking 
that in 7.6.04, the time was not adjusted and the time spent in a resolved 
status was applied to the measurement.  Has anyone else ran across this, or is 
there anyone still using a version prior to 8 that can confirm?

If I am going crazy, and this functioned the same in previous versions, does 
anyone have thoughts on how I could work around this issue?  If our techs 
really wanted to workaround the SLM timer, they could basically keep moving the 
incident to a resolved status when they weren't working the ticket to continue 
moving out the SLM target date.

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"

Reply via email to