Dave, what would you think of an escalation that fires using the same qualification and does an Application-Delete-Entry "$SCHEMA$" $1$, have it fire daily if you care to and it'll automatically keep the records trimmed.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 7:48 AM, Dave Barber <daddy.bar...@gmail.com> wrote: > ** > All, > > I'm trying to figure out the syntax required for > Application-Query-Delete-Entry .... (Server is running ARS 7.5) > > Trying to keep an "archive" of emails - we have a requirement to keep 6 > months worth in the system (audit trail, proof of sending, etc.), and the > form was actually turning out to be the largest on the system (over 7 > million records - I manually deleted the older ones via the user tool, that > is not fun!). > > In an active link, just trying a simple > $PROCESS$ @@:Application-Query-Delete-Entry "AR System Email Messages" > '3' < ($TIMESTAMP$ - (86400 * 75)) > > The 75 is related to a test system and the data that is on it (would > obviously be changed on live). The query itself is fine against the email > messages form, it just comes up with a qualification error when run via the > active link. > > Any suggestions? I could try an alternative using > Application-Delete-Entry <form> <record ID> and table walking, but that'll > be horrendously inefficient in comparison to Application-Query-Delete- > Entry. > > Regards > > Dave Barber > _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"