Thank you LJ Longwing. Thanks, Radhika Narayanan
From: ARSList [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of LJ LongWing Sent: Monday, January 15, 2018 8:42 PM To: ARSList Subject: Re: Monitoring Remedy from Load balancer Narayanan, I have a tool that is available on my site that does exactly that http://remedylegacy.com/tools/apllbmonitor/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__remedylegacy.com_tools_apllbmonitor_&d=DwMFaQ&c=H50I6Bh8SW87d_bXfZP_8g&r=blQKSsGpUV3vEddB0ufOi2izy5lUOikNQGO3le4xQkw&m=P-q0HYow-OUzOK8kTEUnQroT5yUKn5icTtzfEmb8NzU&s=6zpiDBDL7URSBcgKzN1qXq9r2eOvHtqNmgtVz62aNMA&e=> it has rudimentary checks that it does OOTB but allows you to customize a filter guide on the server to perform whatever wellness checks you need to perform. On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 2:51 AM, Narayanan, Radhika <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi List, Are there ways to route requests to Remedy AR Server nodes from F5 Load balancer based on health of the Remedy application , in addition to regular TCP Port based checking & routing? There is F5 load balancer forwarding requests to AR Servers based on AR TCP Port health check. If a server responds on TCP port, then the load balancer will forward requests to that server based on routing algorithm. In circumstances, where port responds but Remedy application doesn’t respond, have you got suggestions on alternate ways of health check that can be implemented on Load balancer that is also taken into account before forwarding the request to AR Server(s)? Thanks, Radhika Narayanan -- ARSList mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://mailman.rrr.se/cgi/listinfo/arslist<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mailman.rrr.se_cgi_listinfo_arslist&d=DwMFaQ&c=H50I6Bh8SW87d_bXfZP_8g&r=blQKSsGpUV3vEddB0ufOi2izy5lUOikNQGO3le4xQkw&m=P-q0HYow-OUzOK8kTEUnQroT5yUKn5icTtzfEmb8NzU&s=995mFJQ-5eH83Jh4mDVKZVpFzKfTO5yFxuIkOiSuoSs&e=>
-- ARSList mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.rrr.se/cgi/listinfo/arslist
