Yes, I have used 9.1.03, 9.1.04 and 18.08 against our non-prod 9.1.02 AR
servers. The only issue we saw was with 9.1.04 and dreadful performance.
There was some parameter in config.properties that would get pulled from
central config (so it affected a fresh .war deployment) that would make
form load times excruciating, even after pre-loading. Once we figured this
out, we created a new Cluster ID right after getting a fresh MT up and
running, which prevented the old configuration from being pull from the DB.
Worked great once we manually re-configured.

Jason

On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 5:24 AM Dave Barber <daddy.bar...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Shortly after messaging, I experienced similar - 9.1.04 p002 was supposed
> to fix these problems.
>
> We have a mixture of in-house applications and lightly modified OOTB, and
> it is normally the work detail tab that disappears, along with a few fields
> and buttons of our own.
>
> Has anyone ever tried the 18.05 or 18.08 mid tiers against a 9.1.02 AR
> Server?  (I'm grasping at straws, our mid tiers are a continual pain during
> migrations, but the amount of pain varies randomly)
>
> On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 16:45, Jason Miller <jason.mil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I should not have said anything. Right after I sent this, one of our Mid
>> Tiers had corrupt cache and I had to stop TC and delete files. The telltale
>> sign usually is that the Work Detail table on the Incident form does not
>> show up. If the Work Detail panel is blank we know it is time to do the
>> cache dance with that MT server.
>>
>> Jason
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 9:53 AM Dave Barber <daddy.bar...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> We have been finding different behaviours across servers; we have 5 or 6
>>> forms/areas to check, and we can find that each server seems to randomly
>>> miss elements - doesn't matter if we have made any changes to that form on
>>> a deployment, the mid tiers just misbehave.  Random selection of
>>> sync/flush/restart and after an hour or two things tend to be working.
>>>
>>> I'll try that method of installation on one of our pre-prod servers,
>>> does sound very easy.
>>>
>>> On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 15:12, Jason Miller <jason.mil...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> We too have issues with 9.1 SP2 and cache. Basically sync cache and
>>>> flush cache features are not usable. Anytime our cache becomes corrupt or a
>>>> major change needs to be picked up, we need to shut down the Mid Tiers and
>>>> manually delete files in ./midtier and ./tomcat. Unfortunately our upgrade
>>>> to (originally SP4 but now 18.08) keeps getting delayed for production.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 7:52 AM Dave Barber <daddy.bar...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> All,
>>>>>
>>>>> Our live AR Servers are on 9.1.02. Our mid tiers are on 9.1.03.
>>>>>
>>>>> There are some really weird caching issues that appear to have been
>>>>> fixed on 9.1.04 patch 002 - so I have been looking into upgrading the mid
>>>>> tier to 9.1.04 patch 002. (If anyone is interested, there are massive
>>>>> inconsistencies in the mid tier handling of changes - whenever we make a
>>>>> change, we find the mid tiers either not reflecting the change, needing
>>>>> several restarts to pick up the change, random parts of forms stop
>>>>> rendering properly - CHG:Infrastructure Change Work Info table being one
>>>>> that disappears).
>>>>>
>>>>> 9.1.04 itself is fine, but the patching to 9.1.04 patch 002 does not
>>>>> appear to work - can't even import the 9.1.04 patch 002 deployment package
>>>>> into the deployment console, as it seems to require the 9.1.04 updates to
>>>>> the deployment console.
>>>>>
>>>>> Has anyone manually updated a 9.1.04 mid tier without using the
>>>>> deployment management console?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Dave
>>>>> --
>>>>> ARSList mailing list
>>>>> ARSList@arslist.org
>>>>> https://mailman.rrr.se/cgi/listinfo/arslist
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> ARSList mailing list
>>>> ARSList@arslist.org
>>>> https://mailman.rrr.se/cgi/listinfo/arslist
>>>>
>>> --
>>> ARSList mailing list
>>> ARSList@arslist.org
>>> https://mailman.rrr.se/cgi/listinfo/arslist
>>>
>> --
>> ARSList mailing list
>> ARSList@arslist.org
>> https://mailman.rrr.se/cgi/listinfo/arslist
>>
> --
> ARSList mailing list
> ARSList@arslist.org
> https://mailman.rrr.se/cgi/listinfo/arslist
>
-- 
ARSList mailing list
ARSList@arslist.org
https://mailman.rrr.se/cgi/listinfo/arslist

Reply via email to