I am not using the status history times.  I've verified this is a bug and am
preparing to report it with demonstration code.  The scenario is like this:

Start Time: $TIMESTAMP$
Amount: 2
Units: Days
Segment1: Business Hours Schedule
Segment2: Holiday Schedule

RP for subtract: $PROCESS$ @@:Application-Bus-Time2-Subtract $Start Date$
$Amount$ $Units$ $Segment1$ $Segment2$
Returns: 1/9/2007 6:00:00 PM

RP for Add: $PROCESS$ @@:Application-Bus-Time2-Add $Start Date$ $Amount$
$Units$ $Segment1$ $Segment2$
Returns: 1/15/2007 12:25:49 PM

The problem is that the Application-Bus-Time2-Subtract always defaults the
'time' to the latest 'time of day' defined for the expected date.  The
subtraction works fine for all other units (seconds, minutes, hours); just
not for days.

Axton Grams

On 1/11/07, Sullivan, Neil G CTR USAF AFRL/SNOX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

** Axton,

Are you having any trouble with your filter not recognizing the '
Status-History.Closed.TIME' field or do you not use that in your process?

Neil "Sully" Sullivan
Remedy Developer/Administrator
AFRL/SNOX
Wright Patterson AFB, OH 45433
937-904-9788

 ------------------------------
*From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Axton
*Sent:* Thursday, January 11, 2007 11:10 AM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Business Time 2


** Sanity check needed.  For those using business time 2, have you noticed
any oddities using the business time subtract with days as the units?  It
seems that date/time returned defaults to the end of the day.  If I convert
the days value to seconds, using 10 hours per day, the timestamp returned is
accurate.

Axton Grams
__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___
__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers 
Are"

Reply via email to