********** -----------
"OK, I see what you mean about the 21 seconds. Thank you all So Much! During "normal activity" there is no delay for Authentication (see below). How can I pursue this? Normal Windows performance logs show nothing out of the ordinary, even when this issue shows up for 15+ minutes. I don't have Netowrk problems (on the server side anyway), disk, processor or memory issues. The Domain Controllers show no issues outside of normal authenitcation (approximately 3/authentications per second). We have 7 different Domain Controllers. Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED] <PLGN> <TID: 001640> <RPC ID: 0000008939> <Queue: AREA > <Client-RPC: 390695> /* Tue Jan 23 2007 16:27:52.1250 */ +VL AREAVerifyLoginCallback -- user r******** <PLGN> <TID: 001640> <RPC ID: 0000008939> <Queue: AREA > <Client-RPC: 390695> /* Tue Jan 23 2007 16:27:52.1250 */ - VL OK <PLGN> <TID: 001640> <RPC ID: 0000008941> <Queue: AREA > <Client-RPC: 390695> /* Tue Jan 23 2007 16:28:56.0090 */ +VL AREAVerifyLoginCallback -- user m******** <PLGN> <TID: 001640> <RPC ID: 0000008941> <Queue: AREA > <Client-RPC: 390695> /* Tue Jan 23 2007 16:28:56.0250 */ - VL OK <PLGN> <TID: 001640> <RPC ID: 0000008943> <Queue: AREA > <Client-RPC: 390695> /* Tue Jan 23 2007 16:28:56.0870 */ +NS AREANeedToSyncCallback <PLGN> <TID: 001640> <RPC ID: 0000008943> <Queue: AREA > <Client-RPC: 390695> /* Tue Jan 23 2007 16:28:56.0870 */ - NS OK -- 0 On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:57:55 -0500, patrick zandi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Usually you have the default of 0,, which means no license for you ! >I was thinking if you even made that 1 which is a read license.. it might >show you something you did not see before.. >but It is clear in the Logs, that a 21 second delay is pretty heavy on the >ldap connection, then immediately it is pounded by bind.. >bind is either timed out, or the network did not go clean and the individual >login failed. >you can possibly put in 2 different binds.. > >Is this ars ? version ? again.. >Oh wait, there are 5 fixed external authentication issues within ARS 6.3.. >Even patch 14 has a bug.. Wish they would give a patch number - but support >site does not.. >So I would recommend a patch... >I suppose I would consider upgrading a patch or 2.. > " ---------- ************** _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are"
