Robert,
Hmm, could it be more difficult than a change to ITSM7? You know, I could get into a lot of trouble for this. On the one hand, I love the look and feel of ITSM7. Most certainly it feels more ITIL aligned than ITSM6, and has some neat stuff in it. On the other, gosh I hate converting people from ITSM6 to it, and really, waiting for ITSM6 on CMDB2.0 makes a lot of sense for a lot of people. A number of folks I know and respect have commented on ITSM6 being a very good option, and as soon as the upgrade to CMDB2.0 is available I think that answers that issue. [anybody want a really heated discussion of the field ids in ITSM7? Ed, got your breakdown spreadsheet of how many are outside the prescribed range done yet?] thanks for the kudos .. Daniel _____ From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Molenda Sent: February 19, 2007 8:01 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: ADM:Timing Test, please ignore Thanks Daniel; We DO appreciate your efforts :-) Hopefully your upgrade goes better than ITSM7. Oh wait those are "in side the head words". darn those just keep leaking out these days. Thanks-n-advance; HDT Platform Incident / Problem Manager & Architect Robert Molenda IT OS PA Tel: +1 408 503 2701 Fax: +1 408 503 2912 Mobile: +1 408 472 8097 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Quality begins with your actions. __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in it___ __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in it___ __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in it___ _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are"
